On 12/16/2002 9:45 PM, Vincent Jardin wrote:
With FreeBSD, there are many ways to create a recursive local encapsulation
loop within the IPv4 and IPv6 stack.
...
There is a simple local solution that is used by gif_output() that is not
protected by any mutex:
..
if (++called > max_gif_nestin
Darcy, Hendry, and BABOLO(?),
sorry for the troubles. and, hope the server is accessible now.
i won't use the cheapest registrar ($8.95/year) next time...
anyway. i would appreciate any suggestion, feedback, etc from
the hackers community.
thanks,
-- taka
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> while working on a design overhaul of the kernel routing table
[..]
Hi Andre,
I was wondering what is the status of your "overhaul of the kernel
routing table"... has it been committed? in which branch?
thanks
marco
To Unsubs
> I'm using MPD 3.10 on a FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #0: Sat Apr 13
> 19:16:07 CEST
Isn'it a problem to run a recent MPD application on
an 'old' 4.4 system?
Thanks.
oc
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> On 12/16/2002 9:45 PM, Vincent Jardin wrote:
> >
> > With FreeBSD, there are many ways to create a recursive local encapsulation
> > loop within the IPv4 and IPv6 stack.
> ...
> > There is a simple local solution that is used by gif_output() that is not
> > protected by any mutex:
> ..
> >
there were some bugfixes to the netgraph modules
since 4.4
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Olivier Cherrier wrote:
> > I'm using MPD 3.10 on a FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #0: Sat Apr 13
> > 19:16:07 CEST
>
> Isn'it a problem to run a recent MPD application on
> an 'old' 4.4 system?
>
> Thanks.
> oc
>
> To Uns
Hey all,
I'm building a Snort box and want to have two ip-less nics for detecting
and one with IP for management. Using the hardware I've got (since we're in
a budget crunch), I've scavenged together a Compaq Deskpro 4000, which has
a built-in 10/100 NIC, to be used for management and a couple
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Robby Desmond wrote:
> The 595s are calling for the vx kernel driver, and I was wondering why my
> generic kernel only loaded one of them, so I explicitly stated, in the
> kernel config, to load two, vx0 and vx1. Now they both appear, but they
> don't actually work.
>
> I can
I have a patch, which I apparently never committed, to make libpcap
respect debug.bpf_bufsize if it's larger than 32k. I will make sure
this gets into libpcap and then a release and then FreeBSD (whew).
Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the
