Re: Sysctl and root privileges, how could I avoid them ?

2002-12-02 Thread Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella
JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L@C#:H(B escribió: > > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:17:57 +0100, > > Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > I'm implementing a modification in the > > file "getaddrinfo.c", which calls a sysctlbyname > > function, but the problem is that > > th

Re: Multihoming - implementing RFC 1122

2002-12-02 Thread Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella
Helge Oldach escribió: > > All, > > I wonder whether there are plans to complete implementation of the > "strong ES" model as described in RFC 1122 for multihoming hosts on > FreeBSD. Essentially this would assure that a multihomed host would > send and receive IP packets through the "correct" in

Re: Sysctl and root privileges, how could I avoid them ?

2002-12-02 Thread Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella
Hi: I'm thinking in implement a new system call to make my stuff... is it very difficult ? Could you point me to any guide/boot/whatever to learn about it ? Thanks again. JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L@C#:H(B escribió: > > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:17:57 +0100, > > Juan Francisco Rodriguez Her

Any how-to/online book/guide to implement a new system call in FreeBSD ?

2002-12-02 Thread Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella
Thanks. -- JFRH. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Re: Multihoming - implementing RFC 1122

2002-12-02 Thread Yann Berthier
On Mon, 02 Dec 2002, Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote: > Helge Oldach escribió: > > > > All, > > > > I wonder whether there are plans to complete implementation of the > > "strong ES" model as described in RFC 1122 for multihoming hosts on > > FreeBSD. Essentially this would assure that a

Re: Multihoming - implementing RFC 1122

2002-12-02 Thread Helge Oldach
Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella: > Helge Oldach escribió: > > I wonder whether there are plans to complete implementation of the > > "strong ES" model as described in RFC 1122 for multihoming hosts on > > FreeBSD. Essentially this would assure that a multihomed host would > > send and receive IP

fh

2002-12-02 Thread omestre
Thanks, Tim Kientzle, but i still need one "c code" to add to autoconf.c, and gets a NFS file handle to my root directory. We have the solution (diskless) with dhcp/bootp... but we do not want this anymore, due the things that i have sad before. Thanks. All that i need, is that c code... :) In

SO_DONTROUTE, arp's, ipfw fwd, etc

2002-12-02 Thread Don Bowman
I have a setup where I have a transparent proxy using ipfw fwd (to localhost). Data is sent to this device using a MAC rewrite so that packets arrive with my MAC, but the original source and destination IP. When I receive the SYN, i accept the connection, which causes an ARP to be emitted for the

Re: Multihoming - implementing RFC 1122

2002-12-02 Thread Lars Eggert
Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote: I don't like the strong ES model. IMHO, with weak ES model we can obtain the best of multihoming benefits. the strong ES model makes use of source routing, which might forbid the communication where it could be possible. I don't see why a host should disc

bge driver problems

2002-12-02 Thread Aniruddha Bohra
Hello I have been trying to get the 3Com 996 BT gigabit network interface (bge) to work on FreeBSD 4.3 Release. I got the driver from : http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul/Broadcom/4.x/bcm570x_drv.tar.gz I have two machines with the interfaces connected via a crossover cable and have not been able t

Redundant NIC/Connections

2002-12-02 Thread David J Duchscher
I was wondering how people are handling redundant connections? We would like to have dual NICs in the FreeBSD box with each NIC connected to a different switch. Both switches are in the same broadcast domain. In pointers, hints on this may done would be greatly appreciated. DaveD To Unsubscrib

Re: DNAT on freebsd

2002-12-02 Thread Nicolai Petri
Hi, All. Please note that natd supports the proxy_rule command which enables some of this functionality. The only issues is the missing UDP support (which I have patches for locally) and the lack of rewriting urls embedded in packets. Best regards, Nicolai Petri On Friday 29 November 2002 13:4