Everyone's favorite, I know. :)
I'm trying to set up an MPD-based configuration that does the same
thing as my current userland-ppp setup.
The current setup is that the remote network is connected to a
FreeBSD-Ancient (3-STABLE) box, which is then running a userland
ppp over udp to the local netw
Dear All
I want to know if there is any free source PEP ( performance enhanced proxy
) implemented on FreeBSD or other UnixBased systems ?
THANX
_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?
Petri Helenius writes:
> options upped the performance to ~300Mbps:ish while 4.7-STABLE gives twice
> that using the same application. The machine is 2.4GHz Dual P4.
>
Yes, -current is much, much slower for networking than -STABLE. This
is because at this point, network drivers have paid all
Great! I've instaleld rev. 1.110.2.27 so we'll see how it fares.
Thanks much!
Jeff
Guy Helmer wrote:
Jeff Behl wrote:
FreeBSD rack1-5.nwk 4.7-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p1 #1: Tue Nov
12
10:37:37 PST 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC2 i386
Has anyone had problems
Steve Watt wrote:
> When I try to start mpd, I get the following in my error
> log, and don't see anything bound to UDP:3141...
>
> Nov 14 23:57:59 wattres mpd: [netremote] can't bind ksocket node: Invalid argument
Are your netgraph modules up-to-date and kernel in sync?
What happens when you r
On Nov 15, 11:42, Archie Cobbs wrote:
} Subject: Re: MPD UDP setup
} Steve Watt wrote:
} > When I try to start mpd, I get the following in my error
} > log, and don't see anything bound to UDP:3141...
} >
} > Nov 14 23:57:59 wattres mpd: [netremote] can't bind ksocket node: Invalid argument
}
}
On Nov 15, 12:28, Steve Watt wrote:
}
} My *** aha! is that the sin_len in the sockaddr_in being sent with the
} bind request is 0. Lemme go hack and see if that's the problem.
Setting the sin_len in both the bind request and the connect call
made it get a hair farther -- now I get
[netremote]
