Hi list
i want to know if there is any in-kernel made proxy on BSD ???
THANX
_
Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access.
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC
> "Julian" == Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello, (Sorry for replying late)
Julian> I have committed it to 5.0 I will do 4.x in a day or so..
Thanks a lot,
Julian> do you use it?
I plan to use it on a box with a dfe570 (quad port ethernet), as soon as
it's possible for me
I've tested our LAN when I come to this:
I ran nbtscan 192.168.0.0/16 after a 2-3 secs kernel started printing
"All mbufs exhausted, see tuning(7)".
if you cancel execution of nbtscan - everything is ok but:
10112/10112/10112 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
9822 mbufs allocated to da
You need to increase kern.ipc.nmbufs
sysctl -w kern.ipc.nmbufs=...
Iasen Kostov wrote:
>
> I've tested our LAN when I come to this:
> I ran nbtscan 192.168.0.0/16 after a 2-3 secs kernel started printing
>
> "All mbufs exhausted, see tuning(7)".
> if you cancel execution of nbtscan - everyt
I don't think that it will help - all 192.168.0.0/16 routes could
possibly exhaust whole my RAM - besides kern.ipc.nmbufs is read-only :)
and could be set only at boot time or in kernel config. But I think the
problem here is in NFS client code in nfsm_reqh() (I've compiled DDB in
the kernel) whi
If you mean in terms of transparently forward/redirecting packets then yes,
see ipfw's fwd feature.
On Monday 04 November 2002 04:35, soheil soheil wrote:
> Hi list
> i want to know if there is any in-kernel made proxy on BSD ???
> THANX
>
>
>
The problem below (which is still a problem in FreeBSD, but one that
will be rarely encountered) was caused by a load balancer in front of
the BSD boxes, that did not NAT part of the ICMP unreachable message
payload to the BSD's address. (The ICMP includes part of the original
datagram that cau
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Steve Francis wrote:
> Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:00:47 -0800
> From: Steve Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Agent Drek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: MTU problems ...
>
> The problem below (which is still a problem in FreeBSD,
Dmitry A. Bondareff writes:
> For a long time many peoples discussed why Win XP don't work with mpd.
> May be you can help us ??
> Where I can find working configs ??
I've heard of some MTU problems, some of which mpd-3.10 should address.
What's the specific problem you're having?
-Archie
_
> Your suggestion of increasing the -l seems to have made a positive
> impact -- tests this morning with a higher buffer length size of 8192
> gave us a better throughput of 44Mbps. Now the time sequence plot
> shows a window usage of 1.5MB as opposed to the previous 1MB usage.
>
> We still don't
When I used Win2000 client all works fine and fast.
I've tested WinXp with mpd in two places.
In one place do not work nothing.
I see traffic on FreeBSD to Internet and from it, but on WinXP client no
HTTP, no ICQ.
And when i do telnet to some host I see answer from time to time.
One time I see lo
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Dmitry A. Bondareff writes:
> > For a long time many peoples discussed why Win XP don't work with mpd.
> > May be you can help us ??
> > Where I can find working configs ??
>
> I've heard of some MTU problems, some of which mpd-3.10 should address.
It mig
Johan Larsson writes:
> > > For a long time many peoples discussed why Win XP don't work with mpd.
> > > May be you can help us ??
> > > Where I can find working configs ??
> >
> > I've heard of some MTU problems, some of which mpd-3.10 should address.
>
> It might be MTU problems. But the problem
Murat Bicer writes:
> I also have some problems:
>
> I get Error 742: connection does not support required encryption type.
What does the mpd log trace say when this happens?
> And even weirder thing is, it works on some XP machines without any
> problem. And on win2k it works fine too.
>
> My
There is a program that intercepts tcp session negotiation and
artificially reduces the negotiated MTU but I can't find it right now..
I think it was called mssd or something.
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Agent Drek wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Steve Francis wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:00:47
> From: Julian Elischer [mailto:julian@;elischer.org]
> There is a program that intercepts tcp session negotiation and
> artificially reduces the negotiated MTU but I can't find it
> right now..
> I think it was called mssd or something.
/usr/ports/net/tcpmssd
--don ([EMAIL PROTECTED] www.sandvi
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Don Bowman wrote:
> > From: Julian Elischer [mailto:julian@;elischer.org]
> > There is a program that intercepts tcp session negotiation and
> > artificially reduces the negotiated MTU but I can't find it
> > right now..
> > I think it was called mssd or something.
>
> /usr
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Steve Francis wrote:
> The problem below (which is still a problem in FreeBSD, but one that
> will be rarely encountered) was caused by a load balancer in front of
> the BSD boxes, that did not NAT part of the ICMP unreachable message
> payload to the BSD's address. (The I
Hi,
It looks like it is not possible to configure any MRU values with MPD, due to
LCP_MRU_MARGIN (=20).
For example, on the PPPoE links, the values between 1473 to 1491 are not
possible.
...
link.c:
case SET_MRU:
case SET_MTU:
val = atoi(*av);
name = ((intptr_t)arg == SET_M
Vincent Jardin writes:
> It looks like it is not possible to configure any MRU values with MPD, due to
> LCP_MRU_MARGIN (=20).
>
> For example, on the PPPoE links, the values between 1473 to 1491 are not
> possible.
>
> ...
> link.c:
> case SET_MRU:
> case SET_MTU:
> val = atoi(*a
--- Jeffrey Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Time to default net.inet.tcp.slowstart_flightsize to 4?
>
> A straight initial window of 4 is too big. I have patches lying around
> that varies the initial window size from 2 to 4 depending on the MSS,
> as specified in the RFC.
>
>
>> I have patches lying around
>> that varies the initial window size from 2 to 4 depending on the MSS,
>> as specified in the RFC.
> We could not apply those patches until we fix a bug serverside which
> increments snd_cwnd with 1 mss somewhere...
> Take a look on TCP session.
No, no
tcpmssd is working great! thanks a lot!!!
--
Derek Marshall
Smash and Pow Inc > 'digital plumber'
http://www.smashpow.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
I think that packets droped on the WinXP side.
- Original Message -
From: "Archie Cobbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Johan Larsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Archie Cobbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dmitry A. Bondareff"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, Nov
I'll trying to setup mtu to 1400, why I don't see it by ifconfig command ?
>From mpd.conf:
set link mru 1400
set link mtu 1400
#mpd -b
#ifconfig -a:
ng0: flags=8890 mtu 1500
ng1: flags=8890 mtu 1500
ng2: flags=8890 mtu 1500
ng3: flags=8890 mtu 1500
ng4: flags=8890 mtu 1
--- Jeffrey Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I have patches lying around
> >> that varies the initial window size from 2 to 4 depending on the MSS,
> >> as specified in the RFC.
>
> > We could not apply those patches until we fix a bug serverside which
> > increments snd_cwnd with 1
Looking at the numbers, the messages about mbufs being exhausted
do not make sense. Is this a known bug?
Pete
All mbuf clusters exhausted, please see tuning(7).
All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7).
All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7).
> netstat -m
4296/4352/65536 mbufs in use (curren
Hi,
I had similar problems in the past and I found that, if the "Internet
Connection Sharing" is enabled on the Windows BOX pptp doesen't work
anymore in the right way.
bye,
Dmitry A. Bondareff wrote:
When I used Win2000 client all works fine and fast.
I've tested WinXp with mpd in two places
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Dmitry A. Bondareff wrote:
> I'll trying to setup mtu to 1400, why I don't see it by ifconfig command ?
>
> From mpd.conf:
>
> set link mru 1400
> set link mtu 1400
the link commands affect the links..
this sets teh fragment size that Mulitlink ppp wil
29 matches
Mail list logo
