Hello.
I wonder if FreeBSD supports Intel 82551 NICs.
Eugene Vigovskiy
R&D Department
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Hello,
Why is it needed to check both r->rulenum and (void *)r < lim in
sbin/ipfw2.c:list() ?
/*
* Count static rules. They have variable size so we
* need to scan the list to count them.
*/
for (nstat = 1, r = data, lim = data + nbytes;
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 02:15:42PM +0300, Andrey Simonenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Why is it needed to check both r->rulenum and (void *)r < lim in
> sbin/ipfw2.c:list() ?
because the buffer has a limited size (nbytes) and you don't want
to read past it. However there is a bug in the code below,
bec
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 09:50:23AM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >
> > In the FreeBSD May-June 2002 Status Report we have announced a natd
> > rewrite to make it's configuration options more powerful and support
> > more ip addresses to nat to.
>
> I haven't had time to lo
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:33:13PM +0200, Marc Ernst Eddy van Woerkom wrote:
> As far as I can tell from a bit of Google
> research, it features hardware encryprtion/decryption.
Check the BGA ASIC. If it's an 82550EY or 82550GY, it should be crypto capable.
The 82559ED may also be crypto capable.
Hello,
> > - Can I make use of that hardware acceleration?
> Not yet. It relies on as-yet undocumented hardware registers and TCB
> formats which Intel will not release documentation for without signing
> an NDA.
Just a stupid question: couldn't pdeuskar@ help on this topic?
Or is it all about th
Hmmm. In ipfw1 there is always a rule 65535, unless I'm confused.
Is that not true of ipfw2? In either case, should it or should it
not be counted? Can it ever be deleted? Can one have multiple
rules with the same number, as one can with ipfw1? What happens
if there are multiple rules with nu
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:34:29AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I have done similar to this using teh GIF interface.
>
> Each tunnel between sites had a gif interface and I firewalled
> for only ESP packets to and from the correct machines on the external
> interface, and for correct packets f
I was groping around through the socket code today looking for more places
to sprinkle mandatory access control magic, and noticed that in most parts
of the system call and protocol-independent socket implementation,
sosend() is never invoked directly: instead, pru_sosend() is invoked, and
protoc
While I was reviewing the rest of the kernel tree, I also found...
/cboss/p4/rwatson/trustedbsd/mac/sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c:
error = sosend(wso, (struct sockaddr *)0, ap->a_uio, 0,
/cboss/p4/rwatson/trustedbsd/mac/sys/fs/portalfs/portal_vnops.c:
error = sosend(so, (struct so
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Barney Wolff wrote:
> Hmmm. In ipfw1 there is always a rule 65535, unless I'm confused.
> Is that not true of ipfw2? In either case, should it or should it
> not be counted? Can it ever be deleted? Can one have multiple
> rules with the same number, as one can with ipfw1
< said:
> protocols have the option of implementing pru_sosend() using the central
> sosend(), or providing their own optimized implementation. However, the
> exception to this appears to be in the nfsclient code, where sosend is
> invoked directly on the socket:
The NFS code is hairy and evil
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > protocols have the option of implementing pru_sosend() using the central
> > sosend(), or providing their own optimized implementation. However, the
> > exception to this appears to be in the nfsclient code, where sosend is
> > invoked
Does freeBSD support ftp for a multicast address?
Thanks
shubha
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
At 16/09/2002, you wrote:
>uhh... wakeup(&me->ibm_4.3bsd)
>
>What are people using for token-ring now a days?
I have a box which acts as firewall with ipfw and dummynet on a public
company that still uses token ring for its intranet.
oltr0: port 0xd000-0xd03f irq 10 at
device 10.0 on pci0
olt
15 matches
Mail list logo
