Re: Native PPPoE broken (4.6-STABLE), RP-PPPoE working?!

2002-06-25 Thread Andre Oppermann
Mike Tancsa wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 22:54:32 -0700 (PDT), in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you > wrote: > > > > > > >On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 18:53:32 -0700 (PDT), in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you > >> wrote: > >> >> After spending a couple of hours g

=?windows-874?b?cGFydC10aW1lIDUsMDAwLTEwLDAwMCCk2LOh57fT5LTpICEhIQ==?=

2002-06-25 Thread mont
Ãкº¡Ò÷ӧҹ¢Í§¸ØÃ¡Ô¨ã¹Í¹Ò¤µ·Óä´é§èÒ áÅÐÊÃéÒ§ÃÒÂä´é§ÒÁ¨Ò¡¡Ò÷ӧҹ¼èÒ¹Ãкº¼ÁÁÕÃÒÂä´éÁÒ¡¡ÇèÒ 30,000 / à´×͹ ¨Ò¡¡Ò÷ӧҹà¾Õ§ÇѹÅÐ 2-3 ªÑèÇâÁ§à·èÒ¹Ñé¹âÍ¡ÒÊÁÒ¶Ö§¤Ø³áÅéÇ !à

Re: tracking down strange MTU issues with PPPoE)

2002-06-25 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 07:56 AM 6/25/2002 +0200, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: >Yes, but the solution in PPP only allows you to lower the MSS to >1452 so that the return packet is never bigger than 1492 bytes. >However, if you need an even lower MSS, you are still stuck with >tcpmssd. I need to lower my MSS to about 1410 to

Re: Native PPPoE broken (4.6-STABLE), RP-PPPoE working?!

2002-06-25 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 11:37 PM 24/06/2002 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: >On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > > > > >It seems hard to understand how the pppoe node in the kernel can slow > > >things down. > > > > Here is an example > > > >I wasn;t saying there was a problem, just that my imagination is ha

Re: SOLVED! Native PPPoE broken (4.6-STABLE), RP-PPPoE working?!

2002-06-25 Thread Mike Tancsa
In short, VJ-Header Compression! Why, I dont know. The exact same config works agains the SMSes by Redback. But not the Unisphere ERX Here is what I did to get it to all work. a) On my radius server, I had to get rid of Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobsen-TCP-IP b) On the FreeBSD box, I had