RE: new zero copy sockets snapshot, WITNESS problems

2002-06-11 Thread John Baldwin
On 10-Jun-2002 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > 3. ti_attach() calls bus_alloc_resource(), which through a ton of calls > ends up calling vm_map_entry_create(), same problem as above. > > 4. ti_attach() calls bus_setup_intr(), which through various calls ends up > calling ithread_create(), wh

Re: Broken PMTUD in FreeBSD?

2002-06-11 Thread Mike Silbersack
(I'm redirecting this back to freebsd-net, as it doesn't seem appropriate for bugtraq.) I did some quick investigation last night, and agree with Phil that this is a bug. When the syncache was implemented, only a subset of the normal tcp output code was copied over for the purpose of sending sy

Re: new zero copy sockets snapshot, WITNESS problems

2002-06-11 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:37:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On 10-Jun-2002 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > 3. ti_attach() calls bus_alloc_resource(), which through a ton of calls > > ends up calling vm_map_entry_create(), same problem as above. > > > > 4. ti_attach() calls bus_setup_intr(), w

Re: Broken PMTUD in FreeBSD?

2002-06-11 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Mike Silbersack wrote: > (I'm redirecting this back to freebsd-net, as it doesn't seem appropriate > for bugtraq.) > > I did some quick investigation last night, and agree with Phil that this > is a bug. When the syncache was implemented, only a subset of the normal > tcp output code was copied

FreeBSD+Win2K+Wireless LAN

2002-06-11 Thread Kim Okasawa
Dear all, I want to set up my home network to take advantage of the D-Link DWL-120 USB wireless adapter. I have set up the network as follow (see graph below), and the FreeBSD and Win2K boxes can access to the Internet but the WinXP notebook computer CAN NOT. I know somewhere along the line

Re: FreeBSD+Win2K+Wireless LAN

2002-06-11 Thread Jasper Wallace
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Kim Okasawa wrote: > Dear all, > > I want to set up my home network to take advantage of the D-Link DWL-120 USB > wireless adapter. I have set up the network as follow (see graph below), > and the FreeBSD and Win2K boxes can access to the Internet but the WinXP > notebook co

Re: Broken PMTUD in FreeBSD?

2002-06-11 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Ahhh. Sounds like many of the bugs I've found in my own software. Yep, just an oversight. There have been larger, more serious ones. :) > > Phil: In the future, please try a bit harder to notify someone if you > > believe that a bug is serious enoug

Problems with PPP and one annoying ISP

2002-06-11 Thread Matthew Emmerton
I've got this ISP who won't provide support for UNIX that I have to get working on UNIX. I can dial up to the ISP perfectly fine using Windows 95, but whenever I try and configure my FreeBSD machine to dial up, ppp never works right. Here's the chunk of my ppp.conf: [dumbisp] set authname

Re: Problems with PPP and one annoying ISP

2002-06-11 Thread Brian Somers
Hi, Does it make a difference if you set ifaddr x.x.x.x y.y.y.y in your config ? Perhaps your ISP is expecting you to specify an IP number I'm guessing this because the peer is bringing things down as soon as you send an IPCP request for 0.0.0.0. On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:27:48 -0400, "Ma

Re: Problems with PPP and one annoying ISP

2002-06-11 Thread Matthew Emmerton
Sadly, no. The connection comes down even if I specify the static IP (with or without the netmask) that we're supposed to get. I left it out because on Win95 I say "obtain IP address automatically" which DTRT. Matt - Original Message - From: "Brian Somers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Matt

Re: Broken PMTUD in FreeBSD?

2002-06-11 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Mike Silbersack wrote: > I don't think you caused any grief; releasing this information didn't hurt > anyone. Had it been some remotely exploitable bug which was not yet > patched, then I would be annoyed. > > For the record, filing a PR isn't always enough, either. There are a lot > filed, an