Mail sent to putty-bugs

2002-04-23 Thread putty-bugs-admin
Your mail to 'putty-bugs' with the subject: A special new game Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Message body too long (>40k) Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderato

Problems with nge driver and copper GbE cards

2002-04-23 Thread Fengrui Gu
I am evaluating copper GbE cards for our lab. According to previous talk threads, it seems that SMC9462TX has better performance than NetGear cards. I bought two SMC9462TX cards and connect them through a Cat 5e cross-link cable. The machines in use are two dual PIII 733Mhz with 756MB memory. I us

Re: Problems with nge driver and copper GbE cards

2002-04-23 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 13:32, Fengrui Gu wrote: > > Third, I had trouble to set half-duplex mode on nge0. > If I issued command "ifconfig nge0 media 1000baseTX mediaopt half-duplex", I > got the > following error message > "ifconfig: SIOCSIFMEDIA: Device not configured" > I don't have trouble to i

RE: Problems with nge driver and copper GbE cards

2002-04-23 Thread Fengrui Gu
It works. Thanks a lot. So setting half-duplex is to disabe full-duplex.:) I didn't do this before so I was confused in the first place. But the following statement in the man page of nge driver probably may need some changes. === The ng

RE: Problems with nge driver and copper GbE cards

2002-04-23 Thread Fengrui Gu
There is something interesting. I accidentally started a ping command(ping data sender side) from data receiver side. As you know, ping will continue running until you stop it. I started netperf again from data sender side. You know what? The link seems more stable with additional ping session on

Re: Problems with nge driver and copper GbE cards

2002-04-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Fengrui Gu wrote: > There is something interesting. I accidentally started a > ping command(ping data sender side) from data receiver side. > As you know, ping will continue running until you stop it. > > I started netperf again from data sender side. You know what? > The link seems more stable w

MFC: IF_HANDOFF and IF_HANDOFF_ADJ

2002-04-23 Thread M. Warner Losh
Any objections to MFCing IF_HANDOFF and IF_HANDOFF_ADJ? I'd like there to be a common API between -stable and -current. I'm thinking that the following macros would be sufficient for -stable: #define IF_HANDOFF_ADJ(q, m, ifp, adj) \ if (IF_QFULL((q))) { \