Right, first of all let me state that im somewhat of a unix newbie (having
only been using it for 3 weeks or so) so i might be missing something
obvoius here.
Ok, first my netwrok setup, im running Freebsd 4.4 on a p90 with 48mb and a
nice chunky 40gb hard drive, this is my file server (called bi
Do you have "rw" set for /store in the /etc/fstab...???
At 09:10 PM 4.14.2024 +0100, Mike Woods wrote:
>Right, first of all let me state that im somewhat of a unix newbie (having
>only been using it for 3 weeks or so) so i might be missing something
>obvoius here.
>
>Ok, first my netwrok setup, i
Is anyone working on implementing UDLR in FreeBSD Current or Stable ?
This would be a really usefull thing.
RFC 3077 <--- UDLR RFC
--
===
Christophe Prevotaux Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HEXANET SARL
If someone is willing to reintegrate all of this
in FreeBSD Stable or Current in order to have
native UDLR support on FreeBSD.
http://www-sop.inria.fr/rodeo/personnel/eduros/
http://www.udcast.com/udlr/
http://www-sop.inria.fr/rodeo/personnel/eduros/index-dvb.html
I suggest interested people als
Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
> Is anyone working on implementing UDLR in FreeBSD Current or Stable ?
> This would be a really usefull thing.
>
> RFC 3077 <--- UDLR RFC
Have you contacted the RFC authors?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body
In situations where there are 2 routes in your routing table that apply to
a given destination IP address, how do you give one route priority over
the other ?
Regards, Brendan...
---
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of
At 12:42 4-3-2002 +1100, Brendan Kosowski wrote:
>In situations where there are 2 routes in your routing table that apply to
>a given destination IP address, how do you give one route priority over
>the other ?
The one with the widest netmask is used.
So if you have both 10.0.0.0/8 and 10.42.69.
> >In situations where there are 2 routes in your routing table that apply to
> >a given destination IP address, how do you give one route priority over
> >the other ?
>
> The one with the widest netmask is used.
>
> So if you have both 10.0.0.0/8 and 10.42.69.0/24 in your routing table and
> f
Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
>
> If someone is willing to reintegrate all of this
> in FreeBSD Stable or Current in order to have
> native UDLR support on FreeBSD.
>
> http://www-sop.inria.fr/rodeo/personnel/eduros/
> http://www.udcast.com/udlr/
> http://www-sop.inria.fr/rodeo/personnel/eduros/in
Julian Elischer writes:
> ok, so if thre is a new version cooking, can we co-operate with
> adding radius to it? (using PAP)?
It's not 'cooking' that fast... :-)
Perhaps thawing is a better word...
-Archie
__
Archie Cobbs
Hi All,
I like to know why when I turn on ROUTED on my machines they don't discover
the attached subnets to the link. The scenario is below:
I' have several bsd computers each with one network card. All the computers
sit on a shared Ethernet. I like to perform some routing simulations
comparing
> Also I have addressed my computers in the 10.x.x.x range which is the
> private IP address range and not internet routable. Does ROUTED care about
> the range of addresses in use or all IP addresses are using in the routing
> table as valid routable addresses. Just wanted to make sure this
IMHO, this should be done by the routing protocol of your choice rather than
by the kernel. I recommend checking out www.zebra.org for the zebra
routing protocol suite which includes OSPF, BGP, RIP
The syntax is very cisco like.
I use BGP out of personal preference - all you need to do is add
13 matches
Mail list logo
