On Fri, 01 Feb 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
CJC> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:53:26PM +0200, Alexey Luckyanchikov wrote:
CJC> > Hello,
CJC> >
CJC> > I have such network topology:
CJC> >
CJC> > ++++++
CJC> > | Server |< MTU 1500 --
Luigi Rizzo (rizzo) writes:
> Wait a bit -- next week iam going to review the code and
> MFC (with the structure that is in -current ie. the new code
> in a separate file, kern_poll.c).
Sounds good!
We're using the code here with 5 x fxps in our firewall, and the
load on
what is curious is that I am using a 4-port D-link on our
test boxes as primary development cards and they do not seem
to freeze. The card uses 21143 and seems quite reliable.
I know of a bug in the code on my web site whose symptoms look like
a freeze, but that is presumably related to a race in
Alexey Luckyanchikov wrote:
#>Server have not any filters. ipfw support is compiled in, but first rule
#>is 'allow ip from any to any' and dump which you can see below was made
#>on server.
yeah, but icmp is it's own protocol, so you're probably filtering it
and bpf will see it because i
>#>Server have not any filters. ipfw support is compiled in, but first rule
>#>is 'allow ip from any to any' and dump which you can see below was made
>#>on server.
>
> yeah, but icmp is it's own protocol, so you're probably filtering it
>and bpf will see it because it sees what comes in
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 08:32:49PM +0100, Rogier R. Mulhuijzen wrote:
> ICMP is an IP protocol, if the very first rule in IPFW is 'allow ip from
> any to any' then ICMP is allowed.
uh, that might be ipfw-speak (I don't use or pretend to know ipfw) but ICMP is
NOT "part" of IP (that would defeat
> ICMP is an IP protocol
like hell it is
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
At 12:07 2-2-2002 -0800, R.P. Aditya wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 08:32:49PM +0100, Rogier R. Mulhuijzen wrote:
> > ICMP is an IP protocol, if the very first rule in IPFW is 'allow ip from
> > any to any' then ICMP is allowed.
>
>uh, that might be ipfw-speak (I don't use or pretend to know ipfw
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 12:07:29PM -0800, R.P. Aditya wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 08:32:49PM +0100, Rogier R. Mulhuijzen wrote:
> > ICMP is an IP protocol, if the very first rule in IPFW is 'allow ip from
> > any to any' then ICMP is allowed.
>
> uh, that might be ipfw-speak (I don't use or
Brian Somers writes:
> If you could find a spec on how to talk MSCHAP & MSCHAPv2 to a radius
> server, I'd certainly be happy to add support to ppp. You never know
> - the client may come back :*)
Try these...
Microsoft Vendor-specific RADIUS Attributes
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc
David Gilbert writes:
> I'm using mpd-netgraph to attempt to connect an encrypted tunnel. It
> appears to connect (according to the messages), but the following is
> spit out for most packets I try to put down the tunnel:
>
> [vpn] LCP: rec'd Protocol Reject #1 link 0 (Opened)
> [vpn] LCP: proto
> what is curious is that I am using a 4-port D-link on our
> test boxes as primary development cards and they do not seem
> to freeze. The card uses 21143 and seems quite reliable.
>
> I know of a bug in the code on my web site whose symptoms look like
> a freeze, but that is presumably related
12 matches
Mail list logo
