Re: multi-NIC broadcasting: it isn't

2002-01-07 Thread Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
>Uh, nowhere? That is the required behavior. 255.255.255.255 is the >_local_ broadcast address. It never crosses a router. If you want broadcasts to work between all 4 10.* networks you will have to bridge between them and make the netmask a little wider so that they're all in the same IP subn

Workaround (RE: TCP connection via IPsec machine also running natd)

2002-01-07 Thread Cambria, Mike
I'm able to workaround the problem posted earlier by doing the following: Since the machine which "eats" the received esp packets after natd is a router for the subnet making natd necessary, I'm able to connect to this machine by establishing sessions to any of the IP addresses on the other side

Juniper IOS install woes on FreeBSD machine

2002-01-07 Thread Nevin E. Leiby
I have begun an research project at my university in hopes ofimplementing a network of FreeBSD workstations running JunOS.  Unfortunately, I am having some difficulties with the JunOS (v5-r1)extraction process on the FreeBSD machine (4.4). Although I havescanned attempted to execute the extr

Re: Juniper IOS install woes on FreeBSD machine

2002-01-07 Thread Nevin E. Leiby
> Umm... doesn't JunOS only run on Juniper hardware (ie. routers)?! > Though based on the FreeBSD kernel, I'd be surprised if you could > just run JunOS on a FreeBSD workstation... ... > Why would you install JunOS on a workstation? JunOS is developed > especially for Juniper routers, and I would

Re: name resolution problems and "full socket buffers"

2002-01-07 Thread Rachel Leising
Crist, Please see output in-line below... >On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:22:00PM -0800, Rachel Leising wrote: >> >> -- >> I can't seem to get name resolution working correctly. >> >> According to sniffer output, the dns query goes out fine and the >> response comes back just fine. However, my m