Bosko:
Sorry for the delayed response...
some comments below..
Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 09:42:30AM -0600, Randall Stewart wrote:
> > Hi all:
> >
> > I have a question. I have been working to test the new
> > sctp_drain function I am adding and have had a very difficult
I have found the bug, it's a one-line change in netinet/if_ether.c
@@ -574,5 +574,4 @@ in_arpinput(m)
m_freem(m);
return;
}
- ia = ifatoia(ifa);
match:
I am waiting for re@ to approve the commit. The c
Hi Folks,
Just checking out some developer info on OS/X and I came upon this
interesting quote:
For kernel developers, Darwin provides the Network Kernel Extension (NKE)
facility. This
allows developers to create networking modules and even entire protocol stacks
that can be
dynamical
I can comment from the Mac OS X perspective...
On Wednesday, December 26, 2001, at 11:07 , George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Just checking out some developer info on OS/X and I came upon this
> interesting quote:
[snip]
> Can anyone comment on the progeny of the TCP/IP st
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 11:07:48AM -0800, George V. Neville-Neil thus spoke:
> Just checking out some developer info on OS/X and I came upon this
> interesting quote:
> For kernel developers, Darwin provides the Network Kernel
> Extension (NKE) facility. This allows developers to create
>
> I can comment from the Mac OS X perspective...
Thanks!
And one last question:
Did these changes make it back into FreeBSD?
Later,
George
--
George V. Neville-Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NIC:GN82
"Those who would trade liberty for temporary security deserve nei
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Bill Vermillion wrote:
> I can't say one way or the other but in the past couple of weeks
> someone from Apple posted some fixes to the FreeBSD specifically in
> the TCP/IP area so I'm assuming it's the BSD stack. Otherwise the
> fixes would be going the other way.
I think
On Wednesday, December 26, 2001, at 11:37 , George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
>> I can comment from the Mac OS X perspective...
>
> Thanks!
>
> And one last question:
>
> Did these changes make it back into FreeBSD?
The short answer is 'no'.
The longer answer is that noone has had the time or inte
> The short answer is 'no'.
>
Thanks,
George
--
George V. Neville-Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NIC:GN82
"Those who would trade liberty for temporary security deserve neither"
- Benjamin Franklin
To Unsubscribe: se
> Did these changes make it back into FreeBSD?
I'm sure that Justin's too nice a guy to say that the above question
is just about meaningless in any real-world context, so I'll jump in
and cuff you upside the head instead. :)
What Justin's describing is truly significant set of changes here, and
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 06:13:40AM -0600, Randall Stewart wrote:
> > > 1) One of the primary things I thought the drain() functions
> > >help with is to ward off DOS attacks.
> >
> > Well, no, not really. They're just there to `help' out in any
> > starvation case, really.
> >
>
> This c
They also have (apparently) a link-layer
abstraction that shares some characteristics of Netgraph,
but I haven't looked at it yet.
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Justin C.Walker wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, December 26, 2001, at 11:37 , George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
>
> >> I can comment from the Mac OS X p
Uhh, thanks, I think.
I'll just let them dogs lie for the moment.
Later,
George
--
George V. Neville-Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NIC:GN82
"Those who would trade liberty for temporary security deserve neither"
- Benj
I tried your answer 1. It did not succeed.
I have a rule to do forwarding:
655340 0 fwd 127.0.0.1,8800 tcp from any to any 80
and I have a server listenning on port 8800 at local host.
I also modified the ip_fw.c to log forwarding packet:
Dec 26 13:33:09 yarn /kernel: Forward packet
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Henry Su wrote:
> I tried your answer 1. It did not succeed.
>
> I have a rule to do forwarding:
>
> 655340 0 fwd 127.0.0.1,8800 tcp from any to any 80
>
> and I have a server listenning on port 8800 at local host.
>
> I also modified the ip_fw.c to log forwar
Thanks a lot for your help.
I add "log" into the rule, here's the log info. It seems it does forward or
divert to localhost at port 8800.
[18:10:13][root@test2:/var/log]$ tail -f security
Dec 26 17:50:34 test2 last message repeated 2 times
Dec 26 17:51:34 test2 last message repeated 6 times
Dec
is your server binding to 216.115.102.75?
if you telnet to 127.0.0.1 does it work?
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Henry Su wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your help.
>
> I add "log" into the rule, here's the log info. It seems it does forward or
> divert to localhost at port 8800.
>
> [18:10:13][root@test2:/
Hello
I'm not quite sure if I'm posting to right list but I'll try anyway, all
right here it goes..
I have set up jail and inside of this jail i run ftp (proftpd) using ipf i
was able to forward all traffic for port 21 and 20 to my jail cell, however
it only works if person uses PORT mode instea
Hi
Could you tell me how to configure the pcmcia card in my IBM Thinkpad
t20 laptop with FreeBSD v4.4? The pccardd daemon cann't configure the
driver.
By the way, how can I configure the second pcmica card?
Thx!
ChunAn Li
Advanced Internet T
19 matches
Mail list logo
