Cool stuff and overdue for a lng time!
A few comments on the code:
- IMHO it would be helpful to print the chosen values into the boot
dmesg (maybe larger parts of it only with verbose). This aids
explaining strange symtoms if someone adds/removes RAM and is not
aware of autoscali
Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> Cool stuff and overdue for a lng time!
>
> A few comments on the code:
>
> - IMHO it would be helpful to print the chosen values into the boot
>dmesg (maybe larger parts of it only with verbose). This aids
>explaining strange symtoms if someone adds/remov
D-LINK DGE500-SX works good!
--On Freitag, Dezember 07, 2001 10:22:44 -0800 David Smithson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all. Does anyone know of a good stable 1000baseTX gigabit network
> adapter that works well with FreeBSD? I have this Netgear adapter that
> seems to have problems. Hel
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> - Only do autoscaling only if MAXUSERS=0 in kernel compile. Also
>change GENERIC to set MAXUSERS to null. (This is from Matt's patch)
>
> --
> Andre
Matt & I are working on merging the two approaches, once we've finished
throwing numbers togeth
I am running two FreeBSD (4.4-stable) systems here with the following
GigE cards:
Linksys EG1064
SMC 9462TX
They both use the National Semiconductor chip and are supported by the
nge driver. Both are in dual Athlon systems (Tyan S2460 MBs), connected
to a Linksys EG0008 GigE switch, and are work
I notice that kame has NATPT (a mechanism to let IPv6-only hosts
interact with the IPv4 Internet) and that it has not been imported. I
would like to see if it's possible to import just that bit of
functionality as an independent unit (it gets us one step closer to
killing IPv4). It appears to
> I am experiencing three relatively small issues:
>
> 1. The SMC card seems to take a couple of tries to get the link up. I
>usually get several messages at boot time that the gigabit
> link is up
>from the driver, so it appears that it comes up put
> quickly drops one
>or more tim
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 10:20:55AM -0800, David Smithson wrote:
> > I am experiencing three relatively small issues:
> >
> > 1. The SMC card seems to take a couple of tries to get the link up. I
> >usually get several messages at boot time that the gigabit
> > link is up
> >from the driv
Hello
We have ONE static IP with our ISP via a Cable Modem. Connected at our end
of the Cable Modem is a FreeBSD Firewall / Internet Gateway for the rest of
the internal Lan.
On the Internal Network we have 2 Web / Mail servers which collect mail and
serve HTTP requests recieved from the gat
4.4-stable box
netstat -i shows the number of packets and number of errors
sent/received via the IPkt/Ierrs/Opkts/Oerrs fields. I would like to see
if changing network cables and reset those fields shows reduction in the
Ierrs/Oerrs field
Is there a way to clear those flags
netstat -sz doesn't
Hi,
for some reasons (device polling), i need to register a couple of
netisr which are executed with highest and lowest priority among
network soft interrupts. In other word, i would need
#define NETISR_POLL 0
#define NETISR_POLLMORE 31
Now, the former is available, so no pr
I have a solution for exactlythis problem
You need the patch I submitted for ipfw fwd of incoming packets
about 3 weeks ago.
it allows load sharing to an arbitrary number of webservers transparently
I sent it to "net" and it had a subject of RFC: (something)
the mail includes how to set it up..
Thank-you for the reply Julian.
I will get our network guru onto it and let you know the results.
Tom
At 21:13 10/12/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>I have a solution for exactlythis problem
>You need the patch I submitted for ipfw fwd of incoming packets
>about 3 weeks ago.
>
>it allows load sharing
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Tom Peck wrote:
> > We have ONE static IP with our ISP via a Cable Modem. Connected at our end
> > of the Cable Modem is a FreeBSD Firewall / Internet Gateway for the rest of
> > the internal Lan.
> >
> > On the Internal Network
14 matches
Mail list logo
