Dynamic routing table on my server (4.2-RELEASE) grow up
infinitely.
This is sample line of netstat -nra | grep W3
12.89.146.201 213.24.224.1 UGHW3 0 120 fxp0
=>
sysctl variables:
net.inet.ip.rtexpire: 2
net.inet.ip.rtminexpire: 2
net.inet.ip.rtmaxcache
On 2 Apr, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> OK, we fixed the "ifconfig down" case already. The attached patch alters
> inet routing code so that it does not delete routes with the "default"
> source address of 0.0.0.0; ip_output() will take care of choosing the
> right address. Please let me know if it
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:13:27PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On 2 Apr, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > OK, we fixed the "ifconfig down" case already. The attached patch alters
> > inet routing code so that it does not delete routes with the "default"
> > source address of 0.0.0.0; ip_outp
On 3 Apr, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:13:27PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> On 2 Apr, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>>
>> > OK, we fixed the "ifconfig down" case already. The attached patch alters
>> > inet routing code so that it does not delete routes with the "default"
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 08:55:41AM +0800, David Xu scribbled:
| Friday, March 23, 2001, 3:12:19 AM, you wrote:
| JG> Interesting topic in the linux kernel mailing list (Linux is "a lot" faster than
| JG> FreeBSD):
| JG> http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html#2
|
| JG> I came to use FreeBSD
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> I can confirm the following:
> A) You are a troll.
> B) The above "confirmation" states nothing. You fail
>to state the conditions of the test. You do not qualify
>your statements with facts.
Neither do you. Does that make you a troll too?
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Michael C . Wu wrote:
>
> > I can confirm the following:
> > A) You are a troll.
> > B) The above "confirmation" states nothing. You fail
> >to state the conditions of the test. You do not qualify
> >your statements with facts.
>
> Neither do you. Does that make you
I know that Network Appliance uses the Intel GigE cards in thier boxes,
and they have jumbo frames support...
Im just wondering if since I use the same card in my FreeBSD box with a
NetApp backend..if the wx driver has JF support as well?
Anyone?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I'm having some strange problem with netstat.
Every once in a while when I type netstat -r, it takes
minutes until it displays the entire output. Sometimes it
never finishes. Strange thing is if I type netstat -n or netstat -nr,
it doesn't take more than a half a second to get the entire
It's taking so long because it's trying to do a DNS resolution of every IP
address that it prints. My guess is that @Home uses some non-registered
RFC1918 address space for its clients, so those addresses will never
resolve, and will take forever not doing so. The -n flag disables DNS
resolution,
Jonathan Lemon writes:
> >>fxp0: SCB timeout
> >>fxp0: DMA timeout
> >>(repeating)
>
> SCB timeout comes about because the chip is refusing to accept
> any more commands; in this case, it probably is wedged. Is there
> any pattern to this? Do you happen to have hardware flowcontrol
> en
> It's taking so long because it's trying to do a DNS resolution of every IP
> address that it prints. My guess is that @Home uses some non-registered
> RFC1918 address space for its clients, so those addresses will never
> resolve, and will take forever not doing so. The -n flag disables DNS
> re
12 matches
Mail list logo
