On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:52:39AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ¡Hola!
>
> I need to set a GRE tunnel to send ipv6 traffic. Can I with fbsd?
>
> I've tried with gre-tun, but it says that ipv6 socket family isn't
> supported.
>
Does it need to be GRE? If you're happy using IP-ENCAP instea
Hola!
> > I need to set a GRE tunnel to send ipv6 traffic. Can I with fbsd?
> > I've tried with gre-tun, but it says that ipv6 socket family isn't
> > supported.
> Does it need to be GRE? If you're happy using IP-ENCAP instead then
> check out the gif(4) man page.
Yes, i've to make the link v
hi,
I use FreeBSD 4.2 stable + bridge + dummynet + ipfw.
I would like to calculate the bandwidth of each
authorized IP source flowing through the bridge from a
user program.
As this bandwidth calculation should be done very often
(10 to 20 times per second) I first tried to use the if_data
str
> hi,
>
> I use FreeBSD 4.2 stable + bridge + dummynet + ipfw.
> I would like to calculate the bandwidth of each
> authorized IP source flowing through the bridge from a
> user program.
> As this bandwidth calculation should be done very often
> (10 to 20 times per second) I first tried to use
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> > Moreover, concerning the bridge, I was wondering if
> > there is a way not to put a third interface in promiscous
>
> yes, there is asysctl interface (net.link.ether.bridge_cfg)
>
> see the manpages.
actually that's what I did, but I'm still not able to have
my th
Hello Roman,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Roman Le Houelleur wrote:
> I use FreeBSD 4.2 stable + bridge + dummynet + ipfw. I would like
> to calculate the bandwidth of each authorized IP source flowing
> through the bridge from a user program.
>
> As this bandwidth calculation should be done very ofte
> actually that's what I did, but I'm still not able to have
> my third nic out of the bridge.
> If I use net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: rl0:0,rl1:1,rl2:1
> rl0 is on a separate cluster, so it's useable, but still
> rl0 is in promiscous mode.
> If I use something like net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: rl1
Roman Le Houelleur wrote:
>
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Moreover, concerning the bridge, I was wondering if
> > > there is a way not to put a third interface in promiscous
> >
> > yes, there is asysctl interface (net.link.ether.bridge_cfg)
> >
> > see the manpages.
>
> actually that's w
