Re: ipv6 rc.conf

2001-01-20 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:41:51 -0600 > Joseph E Eggleston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Joseph> I want to have a host use ipv6 to autoconfigure its interface, but then Joseph> add a couple ipv6 alias addresses to the same interface. The end goal is Joseph> to configure the interface with

Re: bandwith limitation

2001-01-20 Thread Royyana M. Ijtihadie
would you like to explain this ? i'm very interesting of that.. Wassalam... Royyana M. Ijtihadie -- :) 1+1 = 4/2 On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Clemens Hermann wrote: > Hi together, >

Re: manual page review: connect(2) EAGAIN error

2001-01-20 Thread Ben Smithurst
> if (count-- < 0) { /* completely used? */ > /* >* Undo any address bind that may have >* occurred above. >*/ > in

Re: manual page review: connect(2) EAGAIN error

2001-01-20 Thread Ben Smithurst
Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > >> +.It Bq Er EAGAIN >> +A resource was temporarily unavailable when connecting a socket in >> +non-blocking mode. >> +This could indicate there are no port numbers available for use when a port >> +number is being chosen automatically. >> +Increasing the >> +.

Re: manual page review: connect(2) EAGAIN error

2001-01-20 Thread Dima Dorfman
> oops, looks like you already answered that (EADDRNOTAVAIL) in your last > message. sorry. If you fix the code to return EADDRNOTAVAIL then the PR > can be closed as it will no longer apply. I sent a patch to fix this in a response to this thread, but it seems noone noticed. You can find the e

icmp-response bandwidth limit?

2001-01-20 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Today I'm suddenly getting these messages: Jan 20 18:44:48 chives /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 230/200 pps Is someone trying to pingflood me or something? Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL

Re: icmp-response bandwidth limit?

2001-01-20 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > Today I'm suddenly getting these messages: > > Jan 20 18:44:48 chives /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 230/200 pps > > Is someone trying to pingflood me or something? > > Vince. They're either doing something that causes RSTs or icmp unreachab

Re: icmp-response bandwidth limit?

2001-01-20 Thread Dima Dorfman
> > Today I'm suddenly getting these messages: > > Jan 20 18:44:48 chives /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 230/200 pps > > Is someone trying to pingflood me or something? Somebody already gave you the gist of it, but in case you're curious there's an FAQ entry about this describing it in

Re: manual page review: connect(2) EAGAIN error

2001-01-20 Thread Wes Peters
Dima Dorfman wrote: > > > oops, looks like you already answered that (EADDRNOTAVAIL) in your last > > message. sorry. If you fix the code to return EADDRNOTAVAIL then the PR > > can be closed as it will no longer apply. > > I sent a patch to fix this in a response to this thread, but it seems >

IP Aliasing Problems HELP!

2001-01-20 Thread seek3r2k
Hello, I have aliased my single NIC with the IP address 192.168.1.1/24, so that i can port out a cable modem connection to my win machine, thus two machines on a subnet. This is what my rc.conf looks like host="host name" IPFILTER="YES" IPNAT="YES gateway_enable="YES" ifconfig fxp0="DHCP" ifco