Hello,
I am attempting to alias my one physical NIC in my netfinity server. I
am using IPFILTER and IPNAT to do this with a static IP on a cable
subscription. I am trying to port the connection to one machine in the
internal network. Can someone please paste in their rc.conf, ipf.conf,
and ipna
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This ought to be documented.
A good start would be to add example of MODULE_VERSION and
MODULE_DEPEND usage to one of the templates in
/usr/share/examples/kld/.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PR
Dear Chutima,
The option to accept or reject mails that have mismatch domains belongs
to the remote mail server. Some sites set default to reject for spam
blocking. What you can do is to contact the
postmaster of those sites.
For example, I heard that some free e-mail providers such as G
We're a small web hosting company wanting to have multiple routes from
separate isp's coming into the webservers from the outside so that if one
connection goes down, the other connection can still reach the servers.
Can this be done? Is this possible with freebsd as the router? Are there
bette
Title: RE: Redundant connections from separate isp's possible?
I believe what you're talking about is refered to as BGP or Sonnet routing, but i'm not sure, I know it is possible because we have 5 or 6 backbone providers on our Network.
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: Peter
At Wed, 17 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>We're a small web hosting company wanting to have multiple routes from
>separate isp's coming into the webservers from the outside so that if one
>connection goes down, the other connection can still reach the servers.
>
>Can this be done? Is this p
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Peter Brezny wrote:
> We're a small web hosting company wanting to have multiple routes from
> separate isp's coming into the webservers from the outside so that if one
> connection goes down, the other connection can still reach the servers.
>
> Can this be done? Is this p
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010117 04:27] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This ought to be documented.
>
> A good start would be to add example of MODULE_VERSION and
> MODULE_DEPEND usage to one of the templates in
> /usr/share/examples/kld/.
Since I have
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since I have no clue as to how they work, it'll have to wait until
> someone who knows how it works does it or I have the time to UTSL.
MODULE_VERSION(module, version);
module is the name of your module.
version is the integer version number of your
Hello!
I have FreeBSD 4.1 release. My computer is a laptop, so I use
pccards. I found that with /stand/sysinstall the lan can be configured
automatically, but for pccards it doesn't work. So, after a debugging of
the scripts (just because I like automation and ease of use) I found a
mi
Hi
Could anyone tell me please why I would receive these messages and what I can
do to help avoid them?
The servers are not that busy and the NFS connection is on a private 10.0
interconnect between the servers, yet I still get these now and again.
Thanks!
Nicole
> nfs server c1.pic
* Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010117 12:25] wrote:
>
> Hi
> Could anyone tell me please why I would receive these messages and what I can
> do to help avoid them?
> The servers are not that busy and the NFS connection is on a private 10.0
> interconnect between the servers, yet I still get thes
Hi,
We're having problems getting our SysKonnect cards to function in
full-duplex mode under FreeBSD on our gigabit ethernet environment. The
switch port, on an Extreme Networks 7i, is set to auto-negotiate at
1000Mbit. Here's the problem: If we boot the systems up without any media
option
> We had exactly the same problem with 4.1-STABLE or 4.0-STABLE (don't
> remember) a while ago. A 'downgrade' to 3.4-RELEASE fixed it, 3.4-STABLE
> had the same problem.
>
> Not much of a solution, but it may be helpful for the developers.
again i have not been able to reproduce the problem, but
Is there a way to do the opposite of Peter Brezny's question "Redundant
connections from separate isp's possible?" He had muliple incoming
connections to his Web servers.
I have 2 ISP's but almost all of my traffic is from the inside out, employee
browsing, ftp downloads. Can (should?) I use a Fr
15 matches
Mail list logo