Re: vlanXXX vs ifXX.YY notation

2014-03-21 Thread Julian Elischer
meaning.. I'm surprised that we don't translate it into '_' or something. Mark On 18 Mar 2014, at 4:42 pm, Zeus Panchenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, is there any advantage of using vlanXXX vs ifXX.YY notation? I mean ifconfig em0 vl

Re: vlanXXX vs ifXX.YY notation

2014-03-19 Thread Mark van der Meulen
Hash: SHA1 > > hi, > > is there any advantage of using vlanXXX vs ifXX.YY notation? > > I mean > >> ifconfig em0 > vlan777: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > ether 00:1b:b9:8b:ca:33 > ... > vlan: 777 parent interface: em0 > > vs > >

Re: vlanXXX vs ifXX.YY notation

2014-03-18 Thread Adam McDougall
On 03/18/2014 01:42, Zeus Panchenko wrote: > hi, > > is there any advantage of using vlanXXX vs ifXX.YY notation? > > I mean > >> ifconfig em0 > vlan777: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >ether 00:1b:b9:8b:ca:33 > ... >vlan: 777 parent interface:

vlanXXX vs ifXX.YY notation

2014-03-17 Thread Zeus Panchenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, is there any advantage of using vlanXXX vs ifXX.YY notation? I mean > ifconfig em0 vlan777: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:1b:b9:8b:ca:33 ... vlan: 777 parent interface: em0 vs em0.555: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1