> On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 23:55:39 +0200
> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> > I know. Please try what's in CVS now (I made three revisions
> > to ng_fec.c). I wonder, are you assigning an IP address to
> > fec0 or doing "ifconfig fec0 up" before confuguring the
> > bundle (addi
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 23:55:39 +0200
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
> I know. Please try what's in CVS now (I made three revisions
> to ng_fec.c). I wonder, are you assigning an IP address to
> fec0 or doing "ifconfig fec0 up" before confuguring the
> bundle (adding ports)?
I trie
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:05:11PM +0100, Marco Molteni wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:51:44 +0200
> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 07:36:17PM +0100, Marco Molteni wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> > > If tcpdump is ran in non-promiscuos mode (-p option), only ping
> >
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:51:44 +0200
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 07:36:17PM +0100, Marco Molteni wrote:
[..]
> > If tcpdump is ran in non-promiscuos mode (-p option), only ping
> > (and ARP) from box1 goes thru, as if I wasn't running tcpdump at
> > all. If o
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:09:57AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> >>
> >>
> >Looks like a bug. The ng_fec code uses the MAC address of the first
> >real interface as the MAC address for the virtual and all other ports
> >in the bundle, but it lacks a call to ifp->if_init() to actually
> >re
Looks like a bug. The ng_fec code uses the MAC address of the first
real interface as the MAC address for the virtual and all other ports
in the bundle, but it lacks a call to ifp->if_init() to actually
reprogram the hardware MAC filter. Please try this patch:
I thought it was suppose
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 08:36:15PM +0100, Marco Molteni wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:43:49 -0800
> John-Mark Gurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> > The only thing is that it could be that you aren't setting the
> > ethernet hardware address on the four cards all to the same address...
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 07:36:17PM +0100, Marco Molteni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following setup:
>
> box1 box2 box3 box4
> xl0 xl0 xl0 ste0/ste1/ste2/ste3 -> fec0
> 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.2 1.1.1.3 1.1.1.4
> | || | | | |
> | ||
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:43:49 -0800
John-Mark Gurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
> The only thing is that it could be that you aren't setting the
> ethernet hardware address on the four cards all to the same address...
> The
> reason box1 gets through is that it is aliased to the arp address t
Marco Molteni wrote this message on Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 19:36 +0100:
> I have the following setup:
>
> box1 box2 box3 box4
> xl0 xl0 xl0 ste0/ste1/ste2/ste3 -> fec0
> 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.2 1.1.1.3 1.1.1.4
> | || | | | |
> | ||
Hi,
I have the following setup:
box1 box2 box3 box4
xl0 xl0 xl0 ste0/ste1/ste2/ste3 -> fec0
1.1.1.1 1.1.1.2 1.1.1.3 1.1.1.4
| || | | | |
| || | | | |
cisco catalyst switch
11 matches
Mail list logo