On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:40 PM Patrick Kelsey wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 4:58 PM Josh Paetzel wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, at 7:17 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> > On 18/02/2020 16:09, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> > > My general experience with post-iflib vmxnet3 is that vmxnet3 has
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 4:58 PM Josh Paetzel wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, at 7:17 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > On 18/02/2020 16:09, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > My general experience with post-iflib vmxnet3 is that vmxnet3 has some
> > > peculiarities that result in a certain "impedance mismatc
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, at 7:17 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 18/02/2020 16:09, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > My general experience with post-iflib vmxnet3 is that vmxnet3 has some
> > peculiarities that result in a certain "impedance mismatch" with iflib.
> > Although we now have a bit less code and it
On 18/02/2020 16:09, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> My general experience with post-iflib vmxnet3 is that vmxnet3 has some
> peculiarities that result in a certain "impedance mismatch" with iflib.
> Although we now have a bit less code and it is a bit more regular, there are a
> few significant (for us, at
At work we are seeing some rather terrible vmxnet3 rx performance when lro is
enabled. We have it enabled because with the pre-iflib vmxnet3 it improved the
performance quite significantly. For example, in a particular test
configuration we could receive ~1 Gbps w/o lro and ~1.8 Gbps with it.
W
