On Friday, January 06, 2012 6:22:25 am Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>
> > Looks like there's a case where tcp_detach could return with the inp lock
> > held. I see an XXXRW comment questioning this possibility, but we should
> > either add an assertion to
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
Looks like there's a case where tcp_detach could return with the inp lock
held. I see an XXXRW comment questioning this possibility, but we should
either add an assertion to verify that the case does not occur, or unlock
the inpcb before returning.
Looks like there's a case where tcp_detach could return with the inp
lock held. I see an XXXRW comment questioning this possibility, but
we should either add an assertion to verify that the case does not
occur, or unlock the inpcb before returning. Or maybe both?
Regards,
Navdeep
diff -r 35bdf8