Am 08.05.2018 um 11:52 schrieb Kevin Bowling:
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:43 AM, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
Bezüglich Kevin Bowling's Nachricht vom 08.05.2018 11:26 (localtime):
iflib in stable/11 only affects bnxt at this time.
You should try out HEAD and let us know for the rest of your questio
Am 08.05.2018 um 11:52 schrieb Kevin Bowling:
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:43 AM, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
Bezüglich Kevin Bowling's Nachricht vom 08.05.2018 11:26 (localtime):
iflib in stable/11 only affects bnxt at this time.
You should try out HEAD and let us know for the rest of your questio
Am 11.05.2018 um 19:24 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:
Bezüglich Stephen Hurd's Nachricht vom 10.05.2018 21:55 (localtime):
Ok, the review is updated with the EBR. If you can update your tree to
r333466 or newer, apply the patch and retest, that would be great. It
seems to be working here.
I took
Bezüglich Stephen Hurd's Nachricht vom 10.05.2018 21:55 (localtime):
> Ok, the review is updated with the EBR. If you can update your tree to
> r333466 or newer, apply the patch and retest, that would be great. It
> seems to be working here.
I took out the sys/net/if.c, sys/net/if_var.h and sys/
Ok, the review is updated with the EBR. If you can update your tree to
r333466 or newer, apply the patch and retest, that would be great. It
seems to be working here.
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Harry Schmalzbauer
wrote:
> Bezüglich Stephen Hurd's Nachricht vom 10.05.2018 20:07 (localtime
Bezüglich Stephen Hurd's Nachricht vom 10.05.2018 20:07 (localtime):
> No need to test the latest revision unless/until you get a LOR or a
> panic (both should be possible with the revision you currently have).
> With the recent addition of a simple EBR API, mmacy@ is working on a
> better solutio
No need to test the latest revision unless/until you get a LOR or a panic
(both should be possible with the revision you currently have). With the
recent addition of a simple EBR API, mmacy@ is working on a better
solution. If possible, it would be great to have you re-test it once that
is up.
O
Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 10.05.2018 19:54 (localtime):
…
> Please excuse that I'm not familar with the phabricator and just did
> "raw diff download" after briefly flying over the comments.
> According to st_mtime this was on May 9th, 08:14:02 UTC (10:14 local
> (CEST) time).
>
Bezüglich Stephen Hurd's Nachricht vom 08.05.2018 20:58 (localtime):
> Can you test the review here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15355
>
> It looks like there are two different locks protecting the same data
> everywhere but in lagg_ioctl(). This is a rough first-pass, and there may
> be some li
Can you test the review here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15355
It looks like there are two different locks protecting the same data
everywhere but in lagg_ioctl(). This is a rough first-pass, and there may
be some lingering recursion and performance regressions with it.
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at
Bezüglich Sean Bruno's Nachricht vom 08.05.2018 18:44 (localtime):
>
>
> On 05/08/18 10:23, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> Bezüglich Kevin Bowling's Nachricht vom 08.05.2018 11:52 (localtime):
>> …
But if the simple iflib/hw-support test with kawela+hartwell helps I'm
happy to do.
>>>
>>>
Bezüglich Kevin Bowling's Nachricht vom 08.05.2018 11:52 (localtime):
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:43 AM, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
…
>> But if the simple iflib/hw-support test with kawela+hartwell helps I'm
>> happy to do.
>
> At this point it would be helpful, we think e1000 is nearing pretty
> g
On 05/08/18 10:23, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Bezüglich Kevin Bowling's Nachricht vom 08.05.2018 11:52 (localtime):
> …
>>> But if the simple iflib/hw-support test with kawela+hartwell helps I'm
>>> happy to do.
>>
>> At this point it would be helpful, we think e1000 is nearing pretty
>> good sh
Bezüglich Kevin Bowling's Nachricht vom 08.05.2018 11:52 (localtime):
…
>> But if the simple iflib/hw-support test with kawela+hartwell helps I'm
>> happy to do.
>
> At this point it would be helpful, we think e1000 is nearing pretty
> good shape and I need to become familiar with any outstanding
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:43 AM, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Bezüglich Kevin Bowling's Nachricht vom 08.05.2018 11:26 (localtime):
>> iflib in stable/11 only affects bnxt at this time.
>>
>> You should try out HEAD and let us know for the rest of your questions.
>
> Ic, sorry for the noise – should
Bezüglich Kevin Bowling's Nachricht vom 08.05.2018 11:26 (localtime):
> iflib in stable/11 only affects bnxt at this time.
>
> You should try out HEAD and let us know for the rest of your questions.
Ic, sorry for the noise – should have read the commits before wasting
others' time :-(
Thanks for
iflib in stable/11 only affects bnxt at this time.
You should try out HEAD and let us know for the rest of your questions.
Regards,
Kevin
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:19 AM, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Bezüglich Stephen Hurd's Nachricht vom 07.05.2018 23:42 (localtime):
>> Author: shurd
>> Date: M
Bezüglich Stephen Hurd's Nachricht vom 07.05.2018 23:42 (localtime):
> Author: shurd
> Date: Mon May 7 21:42:22 2018
> New Revision: 38
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/38
>
> Log:
> Merge iflib changes to 11-STABLE
>
> MFC r300147, r300153, r300154, r300215, r30156
18 matches
Mail list logo
