Re: FreeBSD 10.2 , ospf vs. aggregated static routes, performance issue

nything, it looks like a lock on the route is a > bottleneck. > lots of routes spreads the pain.. Julian is absolutely right - there is currently a contention on individual route entries, so I'd better leave ospf (and keep static route so speed of ospf convergence won't hurt). Or i

Re: FreeBSD 10.2 , ospf vs. aggregated static routes, performance issue

ut knowing anything, it looks like a lock on the route is a bottleneck. lots of routes spreads the pain.. try two manually added static routes 172.16.0.0/13 and 172.24.0.0/13 (I hope I split that correctly) and see if it changes things.. then try 4.. -- Chee

FreeBSD 10.2 , ospf vs. aggregated static routes, performance issue

Hi, I have 10.2-STABLE, 2 CPU Intel E5-2643v3, network Intel XL710 with 1.4.0 driver from Intel I know that going through routing table is very fast (rn_match). But I decided to optimize routing table. I'm using 2 interfaces - ixl0 and ixl1. Behind ixl0 I have 304 networks 172.16.. from /28 to

Re: Static routes issue

"Dante F. B. Col" wrote this message on Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 19:22 -0200: > I'm trying to setup some static routes on a freebsd box for some public > addresses , the machine has two ethernet cards *em0 *and *em1 ***, *em0* > is attached to a Cisco internet router and

Static routes issue

Hello everyone I'm trying to setup some static routes on a freebsd box for some public addresses , the machine has two ethernet cards *em0 *and *em1 ***, *em0* is attached to a Cisco internet router and *em1* is connected to a switch, both interfaces have public addresses of the same

Re: static routes

harset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Ludovit Koren wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > I realized on several different versions of FreeBSD including > > 5.4-STABLE, when using static routes to specific subnets and the WAN > > li

Re: static routes

Ludovit Koren wrote: Hi, I realized on several different versions of FreeBSD including 5.4-STABLE, when using static routes to specific subnets and the WAN link goes down for unpredictable reasons, the server gets ICMP redirect message and rearranges routes to use default router. Then all the

Re: static routes

>>>>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 04:16:07 -0800 >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Giorgos Keramidas) said: > > On 2006-03-20 12:51, Ludovit Koren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I realized on several different versions of Free

Re: static routes

On 2006-03-20 12:51, Ludovit Koren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I realized on several different versions of FreeBSD including > 5.4-STABLE, when using static routes to specific subnets and the WAN > link goes down for unpredictable reasons, the server gets ICM

static routes

Hi, I realized on several different versions of FreeBSD including 5.4-STABLE, when using static routes to specific subnets and the WAN link goes down for unpredictable reasons, the server gets ICMP redirect message and rearranges routes to use default router. Then all the traffic is routed to

Re: routed(8) and static routes

At the other point, I cannot make routed(8) to announce default route without introducing total mess. I tried to set non-zero hopcount to the static default route or to run 'routed -s -g'. In both cases routed starts to announce default route and stops to keep (and announce) many of specific route

Re: routed(8) and static routes

John Polstra wrote: > I'm trying for the first time to get routed(8) to do something useful, > and it's got me stumped. The man page says: > > Static routes in the kernel table are preserved and included in RIP > responses if they have a valid RIP metric (see rout

routed(8) and static routes

I'm trying for the first time to get routed(8) to do something useful, and it's got me stumped. The man page says: Static routes in the kernel table are preserved and included in RIP responses if they have a valid RIP metric (see route(8)). >From reading the sources, &quo

Re: Static routes at startup

Oh, please disregard. man rc.conf is my friend. Thanks, Carlos. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the

Static routes at startup

Hi, I wonder if I can put stuff in rc.conf to add static routes when my machine boots. Is that possible? I mean, currently I'm adding those routes in rc.local, but I'd really like to see them in rc.conf. Best regards, Carlos. __ Do