Le 23/03/2011 à 23:29:16-0700, Julian Elischer a écrit
> >>
> > No.
> >
> > The mount is on the host.
>
> so then I too am not sure why the mount itself would use the second FIB.
> is it possible that some of the mounting is being done automatically
> by rc scripts
> using /etc/fstab in the jai
On 3/23/11 3:05 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
Le 22/03/2011 à 13:39:33-0700, Julian Elischer a écrit
On 3/22/11 6:14 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
Hi all
Sorry for the cross-posting. I don't known which list is the best.
I'm using freebsd-jail since 5.x and yesterday I upgrading (from 7.3 to
7.4).
I've
Le 22/03/2011 à 13:39:33-0700, Julian Elischer a écrit
> On 3/22/11 6:14 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Sorry for the cross-posting. I don't known which list is the best.
> >
> > I'm using freebsd-jail since 5.x and yesterday I upgrading (from 7.3 to
> > 7.4).
> >
> > I've see the setfi
On 3/22/11 6:14 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
Hi all
Sorry for the cross-posting. I don't known which list is the best.
I'm using freebsd-jail since 5.x and yesterday I upgrading (from 7.3 to
7.4).
I've see the setfib working now pretty well with the jail. So I using two
routing table. One for the ho
Hi all
Sorry for the cross-posting. I don't known which list is the best.
I'm using freebsd-jail since 5.x and yesterday I upgrading (from 7.3 to
7.4).
I've see the setfib working now pretty well with the jail. So I using two
routing table. One for the host, one for the jails.
But I don't know
