In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway writes:
>Sorry I've been ignoring this; I'm still getting caught up from my
>vacation. Niels, how has OpenBSD handled this?
Not. We have the same problem. I argue that the test is bogus.
First of all, if we are getting a SYN for this 4-tuple, it is
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:00:04AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Recall my question on IRC about monotonicity right after you committed
> this?
Yes; recall my answer? :)
Kris
PGP signature
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 01:11:48PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 02:37:10PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > In article
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > >First off, I hope this is the right list.
> > >
> > >Could someone take a look at PR misc/27880?
> >
> > This was br
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 02:37:10PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> In article
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >First off, I hope this is the right list.
> >
> >Could someone take a look at PR misc/27880?
>
> This was broken by the initial sequence number patch to TCP.
>
> When the server closes
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> I just tested this and it looks fine to me. It gets the sample code in
> PR misc/27880 working and more importantly it gets PBS (Portable Batch
> System) working again. Once this is merged into 4.3-STABLE I will send
> a message to the pbs mail list t
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 09:45:47PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>
> > I don't object; while the security provided by the new scheme is
> > nice, breaking TIME_WAIT assassination is a serious bug in some
> > environments, and there should be a way to w
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> I don't object; while the security provided by the new scheme is nice,
> breaking TIME_WAIT assassination is a serious bug in some environments,
> and there should be a way to work around it now.
> --
> Jonathan
Ok, attached is a patch for 4.3-stable
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> I don't object; while the security provided by the new scheme is nice,
> breaking TIME_WAIT assassination is a serious bug in some environments,
> and there should be a way to work around it now.
> --
> Jonathan
Ok, I'll whip together a patch and sen
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:00:31PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Glenn Johnson wrote:
>
> > Has anyone had a chance to look at this and figure out what the fix
> > might be?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Glenn Johnson
>
> It's a feature, not a bug. :)
>
> Since everyo
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:00:31PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> > It's a feature, not a bug. :)
> >
> > Since everyone's on vacation and we can't switch generation schemes
> > right now, I've e-mailed kris and asked if he objects to me adding a
>
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:00:31PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Glenn Johnson wrote:
>
> > Has anyone had a chance to look at this and figure out what the fix
> > might be?
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> It's a feature, not a bug. :)
>
> Since everyone's on vacation and we can't swi
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> Has anyone had a chance to look at this and figure out what the fix
> might be?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Glenn Johnson
It's a feature, not a bug. :)
Since everyone's on vacation and we can't switch generation schemes right
now, I've e-mailed kris and ask
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 02:37:10PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> >Could someone take a look at PR misc/27880?
>
> This was broken by the initial sequence number patch to TCP.
>
> When the server closes the socket, it puts the entry into the
> TIME_WAIT state. When a new SYN is received from the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you write:
>First off, I hope this is the right list.
>
>Could someone take a look at PR misc/27880?
This was broken by the initial sequence number patch to TCP.
When the server closes the socket, it puts the entry into the
TIME_WAIT state. When a new SYN is rece
First off, I hope this is the right list.
Could someone take a look at PR misc/27880?
This PR was submitted by someone who works for Veridian, who produce
PBS, the Portable Batch System (http://www.openpbs.org). PBS worked
fine on FreeBSD 4.2 but is broken on FreeBSD 4.3. The author of the PR
15 matches
Mail list logo
