Jinmei-san,
Thank you for the response.
What I wonder is how one would define the "typical, default" case.
Although RFC 2461/2462 does not say much about it, I am having a hard
time seeing in which case it would be beneficial to advertise deprecated
prefixes as preferred by default.
On the other
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:56:49 -0800,
> "Eugene M. Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Note that the two automatically configured addresses on em0 are still
> preferred, while the prefix 2001:470:1f01:3222::/64 is deprecated on the
> router.
> I believe rtadvd(8) should advertise deprecated
Greetings,
Unless disabled with -s flag, rtadvd(8) automatically picks up on-link
prefixes from the routing table and includes them in RA messages. In
doing so, rtadvd does not seem to distinguish preferred prefixes
(preferred lifetime > 0) from distinguished ones (pltime = 0), but
simply adverti
