helo,
i had some servers with freebsd8.0/i386 and mpd5.4
when user tried to connect pppoe twice such an error appeared:
Jul 21 01:20:01 i2 mpd: [B-76] IFACE: Adding IPv4 address to ng75 failed: File
exists
(because the route to this static ip already was received by ospf from other
server)
then
Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
A friend of mine has encountered some problem in his setup which
consists a pair of GRE peer, one running on OpenBSD and another
running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE; with 7.2-STABLE, there is no improvement
over the situation. The problem we have observed seems to be related
to GRE pa
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:38:07AM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A friend of mine has encountered some problem in his setup which
> consists a pair of GRE peer, one running on OpenBSD and another
> running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE; with 7.2-STABLE, there is no improvement
> over the situation. The pr
Hi,
A friend of mine has encountered some problem in his setup which
consists a pair of GRE peer, one running on OpenBSD and another
running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE; with 7.2-STABLE, there is no improvement
over the situation. The problem we have observed seems to be related
to GRE packet not being r
YOu mean you want all 6(?) IP's on the same interface? Ya, it's called
aliases.
I think you are looking for man(5) hostname.if.
--Bryan
On 6/13/06, User Beastie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear All.
I have one simple question.
If my ISP assign one point to point ip address and one full sub
Dear All.
I have one simple question.
If my ISP assign one point to point ip address and one full subnet
mask address (/28), can i have those in one my ethernet interface ?
If it's possible, is there any network routing problem ?
FYI , i have one private network and DMZ .
regards
Beastie
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> ifconfig xl1 xxx.xxx.xxx.63/27
> sysctl net.link.ether.inet.proxyall=1
>
> And use xxx.xxx.xxx.32/27 in internal net for the customers
> with default gateway xxx.xxx.xxx.63.
>
> Swap masks if you want more then /27 for customers:
>
> nic 1: xl0
ifconfig xl1 xxx.xxx.xxx.63/27
sysctl net.link.ether.inet.proxyall=1
And use xxx.xxx.xxx.32/27 in internal net for the customers
with default gateway xxx.xxx.xxx.63.
Swap masks if you want more then /27 for customers:
nic 1: xl0, xxx.xxx.xxx.2/30
nic 2: xl1, xxx.xxx.xxx.63/27
and net.link.ethe
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi everyone. I'm trying to do some strange things to the routing table, and
> I can't get them to work.
> Our ISP assigned us a /26 subnet. xxx.xxx.xx.1 is the main router, a Cisco
> 2511. xx.xx.xx.2 is the main server, and there are a few machi
Hi everyone. I'm trying to do some strange things to the routing table, and
I can't get them to work.
Our ISP assigned us a /26 subnet. xxx.xxx.xx.1 is the main router, a Cisco
2511. xx.xx.xx.2 is the main server, and there are a few machines. This
server, a FreeBSD is an access server, which al
onnection and everyone else through the other while
> still gaining the benefit of caching everything for everyone. It's
> probably needlessly complicated, but it sounds fun... ;-)
>
> Jon
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL
ed, but it sounds fun... ;-)
Jon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Xin LI
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 10:12 AM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Two NIC's connected to same subnet: routing question
Dear folks,
I think I got conf
It seems that this can be implemented through ng_one2many netgraph node.
I'm looking for some documentation about this. Well... Given that my
own server is already online and it is several kilometers away from me,
I'd rather test the feature at lab and then go there for a shoot.
å 2005-02-01äç 1
ry 01, 2005 10:12 AM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Two NIC's connected to same subnet: routing question
Dear folks,
I think I got confused with the routing problem we will have when at
least two NIC's are connected into the same subnet.
The scenario:
em0: 192.168.0.1/24
em1: 192
Dear folks,
I think I got confused with the routing problem we will have when at
least two NIC's are connected into the same subnet.
The scenario:
em0: 192.168.0.1/24
em1: 192.168.0.2/24
We can't simply configure like this, since 192.168.0.0/24 network route
exists as soon as either em0 or em1 i
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me start off by mentioning that I do understand the FTP protocol quite well,
> so we can keep replies focused on firewall/routing issues, instead of
> re-explaining how FTP works.
>
> Second, for my software: My firewall/router is running on FreeBSD
>
Let me start off by mentioning that I do understand the FTP protocol quite well,
so we can keep replies focused on firewall/routing issues, instead of
re-explaining how FTP works.
Second, for my software: My firewall/router is running on FreeBSD
5.1-RELEASE-p8 with ipfilter/ipnat.
Here's the prob
Koroush Saraf wrote:
> Since I have a single nic card I invoke the following:
> routed -s
> I also have used the flags -P pm_rdisc and -P rdisc_interval=45, but I think
> that's irrelevant at this moment.
As someone else noted, you'll need ripv2.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Koroush Saraf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Koroush Saraf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Routing question, Routed using one interface (more info)
>
Koroush Saraf wrote:
> I have several bsd4.3 computers each with one NIC on a shared LAN as below:
Well, on a shared link layer network...
> Now I like to turn on Routed, and have the approperiate routes discovered.
what options are you invoking routed with? do you have firewall enabled?
T
As I have said before. RIP (routed) won't announce a 10.x.x.x network
address, regardless of your VLSM netmask, as anything but 255.0.0.0,
i.e. 10/8.
You may be able to work around this using RIPv2. I haven't played with
FreeBSD's implementation of it. Otherwise, using RIPv1, try using
several di
I'm making a new post to attach the network diagram in order to clarify my
question.
I have several bsd4.3 computers each with one NIC on a shared LAN as below:
+-+
|10.1.1.1/24 |
| +--+
| | |
+-+ |
|
+-+ |
|10.1.1.
> Also I have addressed my computers in the 10.x.x.x range which is the
> private IP address range and not internet routable. Does ROUTED care about
> the range of addresses in use or all IP addresses are using in the routing
> table as valid routable addresses. Just wanted to make sure this
Hi All,
I like to know why when I turn on ROUTED on my machines they don't discover
the attached subnets to the link. The scenario is below:
I' have several bsd computers each with one network card. All the computers
sit on a shared Ethernet. I like to perform some routing simulations
comparing
Given the route table and ifconfig output applying
to the host sketched below, and setting a gateway value
into the windoze machines of 10.1.2.30, what else is necessary
to allow them to web browse via the frame relay link??
I have read somewhere that when aliasing IP numbers there should also b
25 matches
Mail list logo
