Yes, the auto-mesh matters were solved long ago.
Michael F. DeMan
Director of Technology
OpenAccess Network Services
Bellingham, WA 92825
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360-647-0785
On Sep 14, 2004, at 2:58 AM, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Hello there.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 07:19:31PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
I'm bus
Hello there.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 07:19:31PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> I'm busy trying to port mobilemesh (www.mitre.org/tech_transfer/mobilemesh)
> to FreeBSD and run into a problem.
I tried to port MobileMesh once too.
It is a largely futile exercise. The wired segment of your network requir
Max Laier wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 14 September 2004 03:05, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> > At Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:19:31 +0200,
> >
> > John Hay wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm busy trying to port mobilemesh
> > > (www.mitre.org/tech_transfer/mobilemesh) to FreeBSD and run into a
> > > problem.
>
On Tuesday 14 September 2004 03:05, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> At Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:19:31 +0200,
>
> John Hay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm busy trying to port mobilemesh
> > (www.mitre.org/tech_transfer/mobilemesh) to FreeBSD and run into a
> > problem.
> >
> > The way mobilemesh works is that
At Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:19:31 +0200,
John Hay wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm busy trying to port mobilemesh (www.mitre.org/tech_transfer/mobilemesh)
> to FreeBSD and run into a problem.
>
> The way mobilemesh works is that you use a subnet for the wireless
> network and then it use host routes to route p
Hi,
I'm busy trying to port mobilemesh (www.mitre.org/tech_transfer/mobilemesh)
to FreeBSD and run into a problem.
The way mobilemesh works is that you use a subnet for the wireless
network and then it use host routes to route packets to hosts that are
not directly visible. Say for instance that
