Re: request for MFC of em/igb drivers

2010-11-24 Thread John Hay
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:41:49AM +0100, Fabien Thomas wrote: > That fix on ixgbe would also be great to commit on ixgbe before release. > This fix a crash on high packet load with bpf (mbuf freed behind bpf > analysis). > A fix to ixgbe to fix ipv6 routing would also be great! :-) John > Fab

Re: request for MFC of em/igb drivers

2010-11-23 Thread Jack Vogel
Yes, code freeze starts Saturday, there have been issues with igb in HEAD which is why I did not just want to MFC it. I have a driver that now has been surviving long term stress (48+ hours of pounding) so I think its what we should go with, its coming to HEAD today and then PRERELEASE barring any

Re: request for MFC of em/igb drivers

2010-11-23 Thread Fabien Thomas
That fix on ixgbe would also be great to commit on ixgbe before release. This fix a crash on high packet load with bpf (mbuf freed behind bpf analysis). Fabien patch-ixgbe-bpfcrash Description: Binary data > > On 17.11.2010 23:39, Jack Vogel wrote: >> Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the

Re: request for MFC of em/igb drivers

2010-11-22 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 17.11.2010 23:39, Jack Vogel wrote: > Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the drivers, there has been no > activity > because I've tracking down a couple bugs that are tough, involving days > of testing to reproduce. I know we're getting close and I appreciate any > reports like this before. >

Re: request for MFC of em/igb drivers

2010-11-18 Thread Chris Peiffer
Thank you Jack, and thank you Eugene. I will integrate that NULL-check into my tree immediately. On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:39:14AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the drivers, there has been no > activity > because I've tracking down a couple bugs that are tough,

Re: request for MFC of em/igb drivers

2010-11-17 Thread Jack Vogel
Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the drivers, there has been no activity because I've tracking down a couple bugs that are tough, involving days of testing to reproduce. I know we're getting close and I appreciate any reports like this before. Stay tuned Jack On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:

Re: request for MFC of em/igb drivers

2010-11-17 Thread Vlad Galu
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 17.11.2010 13:04, Chris Peiffer wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I've been watching the traffic here over the last few months relating >> to the em and igb Intel ethernet drivers. It seems like there's a big >> consensus that HEAD has some good ne

Re: request for MFC of em/igb drivers

2010-11-17 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 17.11.2010 13:04, Chris Peiffer wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been watching the traffic here over the last few months relating > to the em and igb Intel ethernet drivers. It seems like there's a big > consensus that HEAD has some good new fixes. > > Looking at this: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/

request for MFC of em/igb drivers

2010-11-16 Thread Chris Peiffer
Hi, I've been watching the traffic here over the last few months relating to the em and igb Intel ethernet drivers. It seems like there's a big consensus that HEAD has some good new fixes. Looking at this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c There's a pretty big com