On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:41:49AM +0100, Fabien Thomas wrote:
> That fix on ixgbe would also be great to commit on ixgbe before release.
> This fix a crash on high packet load with bpf (mbuf freed behind bpf
> analysis).
>
A fix to ixgbe to fix ipv6 routing would also be great! :-)
John
> Fab
Yes, code freeze starts Saturday, there have been issues with igb in HEAD
which is why I did not just want to MFC it. I have a driver that now has
been
surviving long term stress (48+ hours of pounding) so I think its what we
should go with, its coming to HEAD today and then PRERELEASE barring
any
That fix on ixgbe would also be great to commit on ixgbe before release.
This fix a crash on high packet load with bpf (mbuf freed behind bpf analysis).
Fabien
patch-ixgbe-bpfcrash
Description: Binary data
>
> On 17.11.2010 23:39, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the
On 17.11.2010 23:39, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the drivers, there has been no
> activity
> because I've tracking down a couple bugs that are tough, involving days
> of testing to reproduce. I know we're getting close and I appreciate any
> reports like this before.
>
Thank you Jack, and thank you Eugene. I will integrate that NULL-check
into my tree immediately.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:39:14AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the drivers, there has been no
> activity
> because I've tracking down a couple bugs that are tough,
Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the drivers, there has been no
activity
because I've tracking down a couple bugs that are tough, involving days
of testing to reproduce. I know we're getting close and I appreciate any
reports like this before.
Stay tuned
Jack
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 17.11.2010 13:04, Chris Peiffer wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been watching the traffic here over the last few months relating
>> to the em and igb Intel ethernet drivers. It seems like there's a big
>> consensus that HEAD has some good ne
On 17.11.2010 13:04, Chris Peiffer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been watching the traffic here over the last few months relating
> to the em and igb Intel ethernet drivers. It seems like there's a big
> consensus that HEAD has some good new fixes.
>
> Looking at this:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/
Hi,
I've been watching the traffic here over the last few months relating
to the em and igb Intel ethernet drivers. It seems like there's a big
consensus that HEAD has some good new fixes.
Looking at this:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c
There's a pretty big com