Re: remote use-after-free in icmp6

2020-11-10 Thread Marek Zarychta
W dniu 05.11.2020 o 01:41, mike tancsa pisze: Hi,     Is this an issue in HEAD only ? Or is it something that needs to be MFC'd ?     ---Mike It has been MFCed to 12-STABLE with r367402[1]. What about 11-STABLE users? Should they be worried about missing MFC as well or ignore the issue as

Re: remote use-after-free in icmp6

2020-11-04 Thread mike tancsa
Hi,     Is this an issue in HEAD only ? Or is it something that needs to be MFC'd ?     ---Mike On 10/28/2020 4:27 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > 28.10.2020, 20:25, "Alexander V. Chernikov" : >> 28.10.2020, 18:34, "Maxime Villard" : >>> In icmp6_notify_error(), 'finaldst' points to data wit

Re: remote use-after-free in icmp6

2020-10-28 Thread Alexander V . Chernikov
28.10.2020, 20:25, "Alexander V. Chernikov" : > 28.10.2020, 18:34, "Maxime Villard" : >> In icmp6_notify_error(), 'finaldst' points to data within an mbuf, but when >> iterating over the next IPv6 options the kernel can free that mbuf, meaning >> the dereferences of 'finaldst' hit a freed buffer. [

Re: remote use-after-free in icmp6

2020-10-28 Thread Alexander V . Chernikov
___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

remote use-after-free in icmp6

2020-10-28 Thread Maxime Villard
In icmp6_notify_error(), 'finaldst' points to data within an mbuf, but when iterating over the next IPv6 options the kernel can free that mbuf, meaning the dereferences of 'finaldst' hit a freed buffer. Note that this is triggerable without specific conditions, over just ICMPv6. Maxime _