Re: does "nat redirect_port tcp" works for you on -CURRENT?

2015-02-04 Thread Ian Smith
On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 02:14:41 +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > On 05.02.2015 01:16, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > > I have such rules in my firewall: > > > > nat 9 config redirect_port tcp 192.168.134.2:16881 16881 > > redirect_port udp 192.158.134.2

Re: does "nat redirect_port tcp" works for you on -CURRENT?

2015-02-04 Thread Lev Serebryakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05.02.2015 01:16, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > I have such rules in my firewall: > > nat 9 config redirect_port tcp 192.168.134.2:16881 16881 > redirect_port udp 192.158.134.2:16881 16881 redirect_port tcp > 192.168.134.2:22 2 &g

Re: does "nat redirect_port tcp" works for you on -CURRENT?

2015-02-04 Thread Lev Serebryakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05.02.2015 01:16, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > nat 9 config redirect_port tcp 192.168.134.2:16881 16881 > redirect_port udp 192.158.134.2:16881 16881 redirect_port tcp > 192.168.134.2:22 2 Also, if I add "log" to this config

does "nat redirect_port tcp" works for you on -CURRENT?

2015-02-04 Thread Lev Serebryakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I have such rules in my firewall: nat 9 config redirect_port tcp 192.168.134.2:16881 16881 redirect_port udp 192.158.134.2:16881 16881 redirect_port tcp 192.168.134.2:22 2 nat 1 config ip $EXT_IP same_ports ... // Packets from outer world

redirect_port

2001-12-12 Thread maan
Hi, I need your help. I can redirect port 3389 for MS terminal server. I have FreeBsd 3.4. I read manual for natd and for NAT.  I do  natd -redirect_port tcp 192.168.1.20:3389 3389 -interface ep0  There is no error. But I cannot conection on 192.168.1.20 from  outside. Can You Help me