On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:30:43PM +0900, Keiichi SHIMA / ?$BEg7D0l?(B wrote:
> Sorry, it needs more work...
>
> Please revert the previous patches, and try with these attached again.
It works perfect with the new patches.
Thanks a lot, and also for the quick actions and for doing a great job
fo
From: Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks a lot! I have applied the patches and it works only partially.
Sorry, it needs more work...
Please revert the previous patches, and try with these attached again.
---
Keiichi SHIMA
IIJ Research Laboratory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KAME Project <[EM
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 04:23:20PM +0900, Keiichi SHIMA / ?$BEg7D0l?(B wrote:
> This is a cached route problem. struct inpcb has a route entry for
> cached route. Since inpcb is shared by both IPv4 and IPv6, the cached
> route entry is also shared by them. 4.5-STABLE doesn't check the
> protoco
Hi,
From: Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am trying to get dnscache running with IPv6 patches.
> dnscache binds to the IPv6 unqualified address "::". This works fine
> and I get (from netstat)
> udp46 0 0 *.53 *.*
> As the sending address the IPv6 unqualifi
I am trying to get dnscache running with IPv6 patches.
dnscache binds to the IPv6 unqualified address "::". This works fine
and I get (from netstat)
udp46 0 0 *.53 *.*
As the sending address the IPv6 unqualified address "::" is used, also.
As long as I only send q
