Julian Elischer wrote:
| > I took the easy way out here and just ran
| >
| > ifconfig xl0 inet 10.0.0.1
|
| Why put an IP address on it?
|
| ifconfig xl0 up
I left out a detail. The modem has its own 10.x.x.x address and
I was killing two birds with one stone -- this makes it easy to
ta
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Greg Black wrote:
>
> I took the easy way out here and just ran
>
> ifconfig xl0 inet 10.0.0.1
>
Why put an IP address on it?
ifconfig xl0 up
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> Greg Black wrote:
> Now, the final question: I have to implement something similar
> on a 4.1-R system several thousand km away. There's no question
> of upgrading it from 4.1 and I can't afford to have it panic.
> Is it reasonable to expect that PPPoE will work OK provided I
> add the netgrap
Brian Somers wrote:
| > Dynamic loading of negraph modules is still broken, and probably won't be
| > fixed until 5.0 (at least that's what the comments on the zillion PRs
| > about this problem say.)
| >
| > Add 'options NETGRAPH_ETHER' and 'options NEGRAPH_SOCKET' to your kernel
| > config fil
>
> Dynamic loading of negraph modules is still broken, and probably won't be
> fixed until 5.0 (at least that's what the comments on the zillion PRs
> about this problem say.)
>
> Add 'options NETGRAPH_ETHER' and 'options NEGRAPH_SOCKET' to your kernel
> config file and rebuild your kernel.
I
Dynamic loading of negraph modules is still broken, and probably won't be
fixed until 5.0 (at least that's what the comments on the zillion PRs
about this problem say.)
Add 'options NETGRAPH_ETHER' and 'options NEGRAPH_SOCKET' to your kernel
config file and rebuild your kernel.
--
Matthew Emme
I rebuilt my 4.2-RELEASE kernel that has been in use for ages
with the following extra lines in the config:
options NETGRAPH#netgraph(4) system
options NETGRAPH_PPPOE
My earlier attempt to run ppp(8) on my new ADSL modem failed
because netgraph was not in the kern
