mosaic wrote:
I would like to ask, whether there are any plans to implement multiple
route tables, like OpenBSD did:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2006-10/2665.html
Yup, we're aware of these changes.
[The feature you're referring to is actually the ability to have
multipl
mosaic wrote:
I would like to ask, whether there are any plans to implement multiple
route tables, like OpenBSD did:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2006-10/2665.html
I'm well aware of fact that i can do policy routing via pf/ipf/ipfw as well of
http://imunes.tel.fer.hr/virtnet/
I would like to ask, whether there are any plans to implement multiple
route tables, like OpenBSD did:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2006-10/2665.html
I'm well aware of fact that i can do policy routing via pf/ipf/ipfw as well of
http://imunes.tel.fer.hr/virtnet/
I'm afraid tha
