Re: ping6 ::1 -> No route to host

2002-11-17 Thread drogoh
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:40:22 +0100 Ronald van der Pol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:17:02 -0600, drogoh wrote: > > > I have rules to allow protocol 41 in and out, what else should I have? > > I had a similar problem when I upgraded to -current. All IPv6 packets > were b

Re: ping6 ::1 -> No route to host

2002-11-17 Thread Ronald van der Pol
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:17:02 -0600, drogoh wrote: > I have rules to allow protocol 41 in and out, what else should I have? I had a similar problem when I upgraded to -current. All IPv6 packets were blocked bij default. Are you sure you are not blocking native IPv6 packets to localhost. You co

Re: ping6 ::1 -> No route to host

2002-11-17 Thread drogoh
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:37:50 +0100 Ronald van der Pol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Check firewalling. I think IPv6 ipfilter is blocking by default. > > rvdp > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > I have rules to

Re: ping6 ::1 -> No route to host

2002-11-16 Thread Ronald van der Pol
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 12:24:10 -0600, drogoh wrote: > I've been trying to setup an IPv6 tunnel and I believe I have everything setup for >the tunnel, but I keep getting no route to host when I use ping6/traceroute6. I first >thought it was something wrong with ppp, but I investigated further a

ping6 ::1 -> No route to host

2002-11-16 Thread drogoh
I've been trying to setup an IPv6 tunnel and I believe I have everything setup for the tunnel, but I keep getting no route to host when I use ping6/traceroute6. I first thought it was something wrong with ppp, but I investigated further and I'm unable to ping6 ::1. Here are the outputs from unam