On 2005-07-12 17:55, Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is it possible that flood ping hits an icmp rate-limiting watermark
>> and then every subsequent icmp packet gets penalized with a delay
>> until a fair amount of time passes?
> Wasn't observed on ethernet iface. But this is good ide
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-07-12 16:38, Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am starting to investigate some net problem and I wonder if this
problem seen/known.
The problem was observed with ce(4) (Cronyx Tau32-PCI/Lite,
it is not in the tree yet, but similar to cp(4)/c
On 2005-07-12 16:38, Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I am starting to investigate some net problem and I wonder if this
> problem seen/known.
>The problem was observed with ce(4) (Cronyx Tau32-PCI/Lite,
> it is not in the tree yet, but similar to cp(4)/ctau(4) devices) an
Hi,
I am starting to investigate some net problem and I wonder if this
problem seen/known.
The problem was observed with ce(4) (Cronyx Tau32-PCI/Lite,
it is not in the tree yet, but similar to cp(4)/ctau(4) devices) and
sppp(4).
If you run usual ping you will see normal delay which is much
