On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 07:17:48AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> On Saturday, January 11, 2025 4:51:07 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 06:25:22AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > > ... the SYN|ACK will always use the FIB from the interface where
> > > the SYN arrived (this is in tc
On Saturday, January 11, 2025 4:51:07 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 06:25:22AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > On Monday, January 6, 2025 3:56:55 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 08:48:48AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > x = y || z;
> >
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 06:25:22AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> On Monday, January 6, 2025 3:56:55 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 08:48:48AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > > ...
>
> > I think the patch is probably a good idea, and the trick of only
> > inheriting the packet's
On Monday, January 6, 2025 3:56:55 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 08:48:48AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > ...
> I think the patch is probably a good idea, and the trick of only
> inheriting the packet's FIB if the socket's is non-zero would avoid
> breaking compatibility for
On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 08:48:48AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 24, 2024 3:34:45 AM UTC Santiago Martinez wrote:
> > Hi,
> > here’s another user of fibs. Each of our servers have multiple fibs and
> > jails with fibs. I like the proposed.
> > Santi
>
> Cool. Read on.
>
> On Tue
Julian <>
For UDP one must already scan the interface list both initially and
periodically to find possible source addresses and bind a socket to each. This
is what makes it possible to answer a DNS request from the source address if
the request's destination address.
While it would be sim
On 12/24/24 1:06 PM, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
Paul Vixie wrote:
i've been thinking along these lines for a few years now, since my vm server is
multi-fib.
each interface has a fib, mostly zero. for incoming TCP SYNs, i'd like to carry
that fib# into
the resulting PCB so that that fib's rout
> On 21.12.2024 19:34, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > How much use are FIBs still these days? Half of the original use cases
> > I can think of could easily and better be overcome by using vnet jails
> > with a physical or virtual interface (e.g, vcc) being delegated to the
> > vnet.
Among the other h
On Tuesday, December 24, 2024 3:34:45 AM UTC Santiago Martinez wrote:
> Hi,
> here’s another user of fibs. Each of our servers have multiple fibs and
> jails with fibs. I like the proposed.
> Santi
Cool. Read on.
On Tuesday, December 24, 2024 5:06:32 AM UTC Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> Paul Vixie
Paul Vixie wrote:
> i've been thinking along these lines for a few years now, since my vm server
> is multi-fib.
> each interface has a fib, mostly zero. for incoming TCP SYNs, i'd like to
> carry that fib# into
> the resulting PCB so that that fib's routing table and especially its default
Hi,
here’s another user of fibs. Each of our servers have multiple fibs and jails
with fibs.
I like the proposed.
Santi
> On 23 Dec 2024, at 16:46, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, December 23, 2024 7:23:35 PM UTC Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >
On Monday, December 23, 2024 7:23:35 PM UTC Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >> Any thoughts/comments?
> >
> > That all said with your opt-in approach if the code itself doesn't bring
> > too many new complications I'd be happy with it (assuming FIBs still
> > h
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Any thoughts/comments?
That all said with your opt-in approach if the code itself doesn't bring
too many new complications I'd be happy with it (assuming FIBs still
have a use case).
Seems there's plenty people using multi-FIB in various scenarios s
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 13:29:01 +0300
"Andrey V. Elsukov" wrote:
> On 21.12.2024 19:34, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > How much use are FIBs still these days? Half of the original use cases
> > I can think of could easily and better be overcome by using vnet jails
> > with a physical or virtual interfac
On 21.12.2024 19:34, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
How much use are FIBs still these days? Half of the original use cases
I can think of could easily and better be overcome by using vnet jails
with a physical or virtual interface (e.g, vcc) being delegated to the
vnet.
I wonder if anyone on FreeBSD is
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote:
> I wonder if anyone on FreeBSD is using FIBs to actually have multi-FIB
> forwardig but that very little touches your use case apart from the mgmt
> which again can be factored out better (or inversely, factoring out the
> forwarding).
>
> I would honestly know who and h
W dniu 21.12.2024 o 17:34, Bjoern A. Zeeb pisze:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, Mark Johnston wrote:
Lately I've been working on adding FIB awareness to bind(2) and inpcb
lookup.
Below I'll describe the project a bit. Any
feedback/comments/suggestions would
be appreciated.
Today, a TCP or UDP socket
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 16:34:25 + (UTC)
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, Mark Johnston wrote:
>
> > Lately I've been working on adding FIB awareness to bind(2) and
> > inpcb lookup. Below I'll describe the project a bit. Any
> > feedback/comments/suggestions would be appreciated.
On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 04:34:25PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, Mark Johnston wrote:
>
> > Lately I've been working on adding FIB awareness to bind(2) and inpcb
> > lookup.
> > Below I'll describe the project a bit. Any feedback/comments/suggestions
> > would
> > be appre
On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 04:34:25PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, Mark Johnston wrote:
>
> > Lately I've been working on adding FIB awareness to bind(2) and inpcb
> > lookup.
> > Below I'll describe the project a bit. Any feedback/comments/suggestions
> > would
> > be appre
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, Mark Johnston wrote:
Lately I've been working on adding FIB awareness to bind(2) and inpcb lookup.
Below I'll describe the project a bit. Any feedback/comments/suggestions would
be appreciated.
Today, a TCP or UDP socket can receive connections or datagrams from any FIB.
21 matches
Mail list logo
