David
Yep.. we got that wrong.
If 1 is returned by the submit it means the PCB was lost. If 0 is
returned you unlock as usual.
R
On Jul 21, 2015, at 5:59 PM, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 03:21:16PM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
>> ...
So it looks like net swi, leaking s
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 03:21:16PM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> ...
> >> So it looks like net swi, leaking some udp6 lock.
> > Curiouser and curiouser... While I'm not taking any special pains to
> > avoid building IPv6, I'm not actively actually doing anything with it
> > (IPv6), either (for bo
On 07/21/2015 15:21, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> On 07/21/2015 15:05, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:28:32PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Indeed, thank you.
>>> ithread_loop() at ithread_loop+0xa6/frame 0xfe083b9c0a70
>>> fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x84/frame 0x
On 07/21/2015 15:05, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:28:32PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> ...
>> Indeed, thank you.
>> ithread_loop() at ithread_loop+0xa6/frame 0xfe083b9c0a70
>> fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x84/frame 0xfe083b9c0ab0
>> fork_trampoline() at fork_tram
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:28:32PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> ...
> Indeed, thank you.
> ithread_loop() at ithread_loop+0xa6/frame 0xfe083b9c0a70
> fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x84/frame 0xfe083b9c0ab0
> fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfe083b9c0ab0
> --- trap 0, r
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 07:17:43PM +, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:19:27AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 04:39:07PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:57:34AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > > > My laptop had no
