On 06.05.2021 18:02, Mark Johnston wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 06:00:05PM +0200, Michael Schmiedgen wrote:
BTW, we got 2 other systems, also with userland NAT but different workload.
After an uncertain amount of time, mostly weeks, the natd starts to spin 100%
CPU on these systems. Quick noob
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 06:00:05PM +0200, Michael Schmiedgen wrote:
> On 05.05.2021 20:38, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 06:35:32PM +0200, Michael Schmiedgen wrote:
> >> On 04.05.2021 21:02, Mark Johnston wrote:
> >>> This looks like fairly random kernel memory corruption. Are y
On 05.05.2021 20:38, Mark Johnston wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 06:35:32PM +0200, Michael Schmiedgen wrote:
On 04.05.2021 21:02, Mark Johnston wrote:
This looks like fairly random kernel memory corruption. Are you able to
build an INVARIANTS kernel and test that? Assuming you're using 13.0,
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 06:35:32PM +0200, Michael Schmiedgen wrote:
> On 04.05.2021 21:02, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > This looks like fairly random kernel memory corruption. Are you able to
> > build an INVARIANTS kernel and test that? Assuming you're using 13.0,
> > you'd grab the 13.0 sources, ad
On 05.05.2021 18:35, Michael Schmiedgen wrote:
On 04.05.2021 21:02, Mark Johnston wrote:
This looks like fairly random kernel memory corruption. Are you able to
build an INVARIANTS kernel and test that? Assuming you're using 13.0,
you'd grab the 13.0 sources, add "options INVARIANT_SUPPORT" an
On 04.05.2021 21:02, Mark Johnston wrote:
This looks like fairly random kernel memory corruption. Are you able to
build an INVARIANTS kernel and test that? Assuming you're using 13.0,
you'd grab the 13.0 sources, add "options INVARIANT_SUPPORT" and
"options INVARIANTS" to the GENERIC kernel con
On 04.05.2021 21:02, Mark Johnston wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 08:38:39PM +0200, Michael Schmiedgen wrote:
Hi Mark,
sorry for the delay, I only can test after work. I triggered another 2 panics,
this time
with a different result (see below). Can I provide some more information?
This looks
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 08:38:39PM +0200, Michael Schmiedgen wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> sorry for the delay, I only can test after work. I triggered another 2
> panics, this time
> with a different result (see below). Can I provide some more information?
This looks like fairly random kernel memory co
Hi Mark,
sorry for the delay, I only can test after work. I triggered another 2 panics,
this time
with a different result (see below). Can I provide some more information?
Thank you!
Michael
--- #1
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 01
fault virtual addre
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:04:30PM +0200, Michael Schmiedgen wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> if I start a Samba jail, after a few seconds the system crashes. Very
> reproducible.
>
> System has ~10 jails and 3 bhyve VMs. Dell server, Xeon E3-1240, 64GB RAM, 3
> way mirror ZFS.
>
> It also occurs a few s
Hi List,
if I start a Samba jail, after a few seconds the system crashes. Very
reproducible.
System has ~10 jails and 3 bhyve VMs. Dell server, Xeon E3-1240, 64GB RAM, 3
way mirror ZFS.
It also occurs a few seconds after I start a phone call using the SIP VM of
that machine,
very strange.
I
11 matches
Mail list logo