On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> I've not heard anything yet, will see what happens later this morning.
>>
>
> Of the info I currently have, it doesn't panic on a stock 8.1-RC2, but
> it wasn't the same config - there w
ssibly.
Nicolas.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/page-fault-in-igb-on-8.1-tp29111546p29146577.html
Sent from the freebsd-net mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> I've not heard anything yet, will see what happens later this morning.
>
Of the info I currently have, it doesn't panic on a stock 8.1-RC2, but
it wasn't the same config - there weren't any VLANs configured. I'm
getting VLANs configured on the
Hi,
Any update about this? Since it seems to be a show-stopper bug those using igb
interface. Any chance that get fixed before 8.1-R?
Regards.
Friday, July 9, 2010, 9:18:04 PM, you wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Jack Vogel
I've not heard anything yet, will see what happens later this morning.
Jack
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Omer Faruk SEN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any update about this? Since it seems to be a show-stopper bug those using
> igb interface. Any chance that get fixed before 8.1-R?
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Is this kernel 32 bit?
>
> It does exactly the same with 32 and 64 bit.
>
> > And is my code altered, it seemed some debug I saw
> > was
> > not familiar.
>
> Nothing in sys/dev/e1000
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Is this kernel 32 bit?
It does exactly the same with 32 and 64 bit.
> And is my code altered, it seemed some debug I saw
> was
> not familiar.
Nothing in sys/dev/e1000 is changed. Copying Ermal who wrote most/many
of the changes. They don't t
Is this kernel 32 bit? And is my code altered, it seemed some debug I saw
was
not familiar. Last, can you try the code in HEAD to see if it changes
anything.
Jack
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Damn, thats bad, and
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Damn, thats bad, and this is with what installed exactly, RC1, 2? I'll have
> someone in validation install to see if we can repro this tomorrow, let me
> know what it is asap.
>
Here are some pictures of the screen, with the backtrace, the ifco
Пересылаемое сообщение
09.07.10, 13:23, "Dmukha Nikolay" :
I have the same problems like in
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-November/013222.html
and you are discussing. Unfortunately, I have no test machine yet. But I think
in short time I can send y
unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/page-fault-in-igb-on-8.1-tp29111546p29115839.html
Sent from the freebsd-net mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Damn, thats bad, and this is with what installed exactly, RC1, 2? I'll have
> someone in validation install to see if we can repro this tomorrow, let me
> know what it is asap.
>
This is RELENG_8_1 as of date=2010.06.25.00.00.00 It's pfSense 2.
Damn, thats bad, and this is with what installed exactly, RC1, 2? I'll have
someone in validation install to see if we can repro this tomorrow, let me
know what it is asap.
Jack
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > O
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Chris Buechler wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> > Am confused, does not the code in 8.1 have that fix, looked to me like it
>> > did?
>> >
>>
>> Maybe I'm confused, but
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Am confused, does not the code in 8.1 have that fix, looked to me like it
> > did?
> >
>
> Maybe I'm confused, but it looks like RELENG_8_1 has the IGB_DBA_ALIGN
> rather than 1
There is one case in igb_dma_malloc() where its still IGB_DBA_ALIGN, but the
cases where its allocating TX and RX bufs the alignment is 1, that code is
the
same in 8.1, or head as far as I can see.
Jack
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Jac
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Am confused, does not the code in 8.1 have that fix, looked to me like it
> did?
>
Maybe I'm confused, but it looks like RELENG_8_1 has the IGB_DBA_ALIGN
rather than 1.
-IGB_DBA_ALIGN, 0,/* alignment, bounds */
+
Am confused, does not the code in 8.1 have that fix, looked to me like it
did?
Jack
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> I'm seeing what appears to be the problem described in this thread with the
> latest RELENG_8_1, reportedly fixed by this diff.
>
> http://lists.freebsd.o
I'm seeing what appears to be the problem described in this thread with
the latest RELENG_8_1, reportedly fixed by this diff.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-November/013258.html
Except that fix was reverted in r206211.
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/releng/8.1/sys/de
19 matches
Mail list logo
