no memory for rx list

2001-12-14 Thread Daniel Abad
What should I do to fix it? Dec 13 17:17:53 server /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Dec 13 17:17:53 server last message repeated 4 times Dec 13 17:17:53 server /kernel: xl1: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Dec 13 17:17:53 server /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list

Re: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped!

2001-05-13 Thread Timo Geusch
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 02:42:35PM +0200, Munish Chopra wrote: > One of the machines on our network spits out the following (constantly): > > xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Did you check if you are running out of mbufs on this system? (netstat -m) I had exactly the sam

xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped!

2001-05-11 Thread Munish Chopra
One of the machines on our network spits out the following (constantly): xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! It is of course unreachable through the network. This popped up on 4.2-RELEASE one single time, then went away after a reboot. Now, on 4.3-RELEASE, it was running fine till

Re: 'no memory for rx list'

2001-01-03 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* C. Stephen Gunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010103 12:19] wrote: > On Wed, 03 Jan 2001 10:10:09 PST, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > You could change the printf()'s to log()'s, and allow syslogd > > > to filter/combine/report them on your console. I'm sure you > > > already know this, you could incre

Re: 'no memory for rx list'

2001-01-03 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* C. Stephen Gunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010103 06:22] wrote: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 07:18:10AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > I notice that if_fxp.c seems to fail silently when unable to > > allocate network buffers, perhaps the fact that the kernel can > > be doing about 200 or more mess

Re: 'no memory for rx list'

2001-01-03 Thread C. Stephen Gunn
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 07:18:10AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I notice that if_fxp.c seems to fail silently when unable to > allocate network buffers, perhaps the fact that the kernel can > be doing about 200 or more messages per-second makes me guess > that it's not helping things, especia

'no memory for rx list'

2001-01-02 Thread Alfred Perlstein
I notice that if_fxp.c seems to fail silently when unable to allocate network buffers, perhaps the fact that the kernel can be doing about 200 or more messages per-second makes me guess that it's not helping things, especially when the box has a serial console. I'm taking the printf's out of my c