Re: ng_split.c

2005-10-03 Thread David Vos
On 10/3/05, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > R> Gleb, is it on RELENG_5 ? > > Yes. That's what I meant. Either it wasn't marked as such when I checked, or I just didn't see it (quite possible). Thanks. David ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org maili

Re: ng_split.c

2005-10-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:15:59AM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: R> >D> The version of ng_split.c packaged with 5.4 Release has a bug in it R> >D> that causes items to get lost (not freed) if there are no nodes R> >D> connected on the other end. R> >D> R

Re: ng_split.c

2005-10-03 Thread Roman Kurakin
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:27:11PM -0600, David Vos wrote: D> The version of ng_split.c packaged with 5.4 Release has a bug in it D> that causes items to get lost (not freed) if there are no nodes D> connected on the other end. D> D> This has been f

Re: ng_split.c

2005-10-02 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:27:11PM -0600, David Vos wrote: D> The version of ng_split.c packaged with 5.4 Release has a bug in it D> that causes items to get lost (not freed) if there are no nodes D> connected on the other end. D> D> This has been fixed in the CVS, Revision 1.7 D&g

ng_split.c

2005-09-19 Thread David Vos
The version of ng_split.c packaged with 5.4 Release has a bug in it that causes items to get lost (not freed) if there are no nodes connected on the other end. This has been fixed in the CVS, Revision 1.7 Would it be possible to bring this 1.7 revision into FreeBSD 5.4 Release? David