Привет Gleb,
Thursday, February 19, 2004, 4:50:42 PM, you wrote:
GS> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:02:09PM +0300, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
A>> GS> In most cases the answer is no. In 90 % cases ng_netflow is used on
A>> GS> top of ng_ether(4) node, which passes all data coming on wire. All
A>> GS> pack
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:02:09PM +0300, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
A> GS> In most cases the answer is no. In 90 % cases ng_netflow is used on
A> GS> top of ng_ether(4) node, which passes all data coming on wire. All
A> GS> packet filtering with help of ipfw or ipf are done later.
A> GS> You can try s
Привет Gleb,
Thursday, February 19, 2004, 3:18:11 PM, you wrote:
GS> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:34:02PM +0300, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
A>> GS>a port of ng_netflow has been just commited to ports
A>> GS> tree. It builds both on STABLE and CURRENT, and was tested
A>> GS> to work on really busy r
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:34:02PM +0300, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
A> GS>a port of ng_netflow has been just commited to ports
A> GS> tree. It builds both on STABLE and CURRENT, and was tested
A> GS> to work on really busy routers.
A> GS>As before, I'd be glad for any kind of feedback: ideas,
Hi Gleb,
Wednesday, February 18, 2004, 3:49:58 PM, you wrote:
GS>Dear collegues,
GS>a port of ng_netflow has been just commited to ports
GS> tree. It builds both on STABLE and CURRENT, and was tested
GS> to work on really busy routers.
GS>As before, I'd be glad for any kind of feedba
