On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:49:51PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
...
> > The most common use of that table is to have an l3_addr and search the
> > ll_addr, right? In that case making ll_addr variable shouldn't have a
> > measurable influence on speed. Variable l3_addr could be different though.
>
>
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 17:21, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Tue, 18 May 2004, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> LR>On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 02:00:28PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
> LR>> On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:48, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> LR>> > I will try to remove as many assumptions as possible.
> LR>> > thanks for t
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
LR>On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 02:00:28PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
LR>> On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:48, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
LR>> > I will try to remove as many assumptions as possible.
LR>> > thanks for the feedback.
LR>>
LR>> I think that in your prototype, the o
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 02:00:28PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:48, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > I will try to remove as many assumptions as possible.
> > thanks for the feedback.
>
> I think that in your prototype, the only assumption was in struct
> llentry. I would suggest def
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:48, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> I will try to remove as many assumptions as possible.
> thanks for the feedback.
I think that in your prototype, the only assumption was in struct
llentry. I would suggest defining it as something like:
struct llentry {
struct llentry *lle
I will try to remove as many assumptions as possible.
thanks for the feedback.
cheers
luigi
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:24:26AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2004, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> DR>On Sunday 25 April 2004 17:49, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> DR>> Here is a snapshot o
On Sun, 16 May 2004, Doug Rabson wrote:
DR>On Sunday 25 April 2004 17:49, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
DR>> Here is a snapshot of the new arp code that i have been working on
DR>> lately, based a on Andre's ideas. (I say 'ARP' for brevity, what i
DR>> mean is the layer3-to-layer2 address translation code --
On Sunday 25 April 2004 17:49, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Here is a snapshot of the new arp code that i have been working on
> lately, based a on Andre's ideas. (I say 'ARP' for brevity, what i
> mean is the layer3-to-layer2 address translation code -- arp, aarp,
> nd6 all fit in the category).
Sorry fo
Here is a snapshot of the new arp code that i have been working on
lately, based a on Andre's ideas. (I say 'ARP' for brevity, what i
mean is the layer3-to-layer2 address translation code -- arp, aarp, nd6
all fit in the category).
The basic idea is to have per-ifp, per-af tables linked to the
ifn
