We should just make netmap on freebsd .. much much nicer and easier to
develop on. :)
-a
On 22 July 2014 21:09, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:28 -0400:
>> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> > Is there a netmap list
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:28 -0400:
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > Is there a netmap list that these questions (regardless of OS) could go to?
>
> ???no there isn't one. At the moment there isn't enough traffic
> to suggest that, and
On 19 May 2014 01:42, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2014 01:02:42 _0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > Folks, i have two requests for you:
> >
> > 1. please do not complain about questions on this list related
> >to a core network-related FreeBSD subsystem (netmap, dummynet,
> >netgraph,
On Mon, 19 May 2014 01:02:42 _0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Folks, i have two requests for you:
>
> 1. please do not complain about questions on this list related
>to a core network-related FreeBSD subsystem (netmap, dummynet,
>netgraph, tcp stack...) even if they are concerned with port
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there a netmap list that these questions (regardless of OS) could go to?
>
no there isn't one. At the moment there isn't enough traffic
to suggest that, and creating one is likely to generate
traffic to both the specific list and
Hi!
Is there a netmap list that these questions (regardless of OS) could go to?
-a
On 18 May 2014 16:02, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Folks, i have two requests for you:
>
> 1. please do not complain about questions on this list related
>to a core network-related FreeBSD subsystem (netmap, dummyn
Folks, i have two requests for you:
1. please do not complain about questions on this list related
to a core network-related FreeBSD subsystem (netmap, dummynet,
netgraph, tcp stack...) even if they are concerned with ports
to Linux or other OSes or to userspace.
At least in principle
