Re: netisr observations

2014-04-11 Thread Patrick Kelsey
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:23 PM, hiren panchasara < hiren.panchas...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Patrick Kelsey wrote: > > > > The output of netstat -Q shows IP dispatch is set to default, which is > > direct (NETISR_DISPATCH_DIRECT). That means each IP packet will be >

Re: netisr observations

2014-04-11 Thread hiren panchasara
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Patrick Kelsey wrote: > > The output of netstat -Q shows IP dispatch is set to default, which is > direct (NETISR_DISPATCH_DIRECT). That means each IP packet will be > processed on the same CPU that the Ethernet processing for that packet was > performed on, so C

Re: netisr observations

2014-04-11 Thread Patrick Kelsey
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > [snip] > > So, hm, the thing that comes to mind is the flowid. What's the various > flowid's for flows? Are they all mapping to CPU 3 somehow The output of netstat -Q shows IP dispatch is set to default, which is direct (NETISR_DISPATCH_DIR

Re: netisr observations

2014-04-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
[snip] So, hm, the thing that comes to mind is the flowid. What's the various flowid's for flows? Are they all mapping to CPU 3 somehow? -a ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, se

netisr observations

2014-04-10 Thread hiren panchasara
(Note: This may seem more like a rant than an actual problem report.) I am on a stable-10ish box with igb0. Workload is mainly inbound nfs traffic. About 2K connections at any point in time. device igb # Intel PRO/1000 PCIE Server Gigabit Family hw.igb.rxd: 4096 hw.igb.txd: 4