On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> of the last netisr through to be bound to a CPU.
*sigh*, that should read "netisr thread" of course.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To un
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov
wrote:
> As far as I understand, the only effect of setting bindthreads to 1 causes
> intr_event_bind() to bind soft netisr to appropriate CPU. Can you point me
> to ML discussion or some other info clarifying this bug?
http://lists.freebsd.o
On 02/02/12 19:16, Коньков Евгений wrote:
Здравствуйте, Adrian.
Вы писали 2 февраля 2012 г., 18:09:33:
AM> A multiqueue network card may help, like a dualport Intel igb E1G42ET.
actually it is not. Intel have hardware separation to interrupts.
So having only pptp trafic on interface cause ne
On 02.02.2012 21:07, Ryan Stone wrote:
2012/2/2 Alexander V. Chernikov:
P.S. it is also reasonable to set net.isr.bindthreads to 1
I really don't recommend setting this in any release. There is
currently a bug with binding kernel threads that causes unrelated
threads to be unnecessarily bound
2012/2/2 Alexander V. Chernikov :
> P.S. it is also reasonable to set net.isr.bindthreads to 1
I really don't recommend setting this in any release. There is
currently a bug with binding kernel threads that causes unrelated
threads to be unnecessarily bound to CPUs. In the specific case of
net.i
Здравствуйте, Adrian.
Вы писали 2 февраля 2012 г., 18:09:33:
AM> A multiqueue network card may help, like a dualport Intel igb E1G42ET.
actually it is not. Intel have hardware separation to interrupts.
So having only pptp trafic on interface cause next problem:
only one thread process packets
A multiqueue network card may help, like a dualport Intel igb E1G42ET.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 02.02.2012 12:59, Коньков Евгений wrote:
Здравствуйте, Andrey.
Вы писали 2 февраля 2012 г., 8:35:23:
AZ> On 02.02.2012 5:11, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 01.02.2012 20:45, Andrey Zonov wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to tune machine with 8.2-STABLE for heavy network load and
now playing with n
Здравствуйте, Andrey.
Вы писали 2 февраля 2012 г., 8:35:23:
AZ> On 02.02.2012 5:11, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>> On 01.02.2012 20:45, Andrey Zonov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to tune machine with 8.2-STABLE for heavy network load and
>>> now playing with netisr. Could anyone explain me
On 02.02.2012 5:11, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 01.02.2012 20:45, Andrey Zonov wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to tune machine with 8.2-STABLE for heavy network load and
now playing with netisr. Could anyone explain me why actually works only
one netisr thread if I set them to 8?
Can you please su
On 01.02.2012 20:45, Andrey Zonov wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to tune machine with 8.2-STABLE for heavy network load and
now playing with netisr. Could anyone explain me why actually works only
one netisr thread if I set them to 8?
Can you please supply `nestat -Q` output and clarify you usage patte
Hi,
I'm trying to tune machine with 8.2-STABLE for heavy network load and
now playing with netisr. Could anyone explain me why actually works
only one netisr thread if I set them to 8?
loader.conf:
net.isr.maxthreads=8
net.isr.bindthreads=0 (also tried set to 1)
hw.em.rxd=4096
(net.isr.numt
12 matches
Mail list logo
