On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
> And now befor send out packet throw one of "many" hook just overwrite
> ip-src address with address given in
> node->private->enabledLinks[hook->private->numb] or whatever it is
> called in ng_one2many.c
you'd also need to overwrite the destination e
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
> 1 let default route be to fxp0
> 2 conncet fxp0's upper hook to "one" hook of ng_one2many
> 3 connect lower hooks of fxp0 and aue0 to "many" hooks of ng_one2many
> 4 u have what u r accept for the overwriting src ip
> 5 time for uber hack ng_one2many:
Tuesday, January 20, 2004, 9:51:52 PM, you wrote:
DN> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>> Isn't ng_etf(4) the one you need?
DN> ng_etf does filtering, i'm planning on doing round robin IP tranmission,
DN> with source IP address set accordingly. see ng_one2many which gives an
DN> exampl
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Isn't ng_etf(4) the one you need?
ng_etf does filtering, i'm planning on doing round robin IP tranmission,
with source IP address set accordingly. see ng_one2many which gives an
example for ethernet frames. i want to do the same thing in ng_one2many's
GS> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:48:44AM +0300, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
A>> >> Connecting ng_iface:inet and ng_ether:upper/lower do nothing, well, it
A>> >> do something but not what you are waiting for, i think.
A>>
A>> DN> i know, hence was asking if there was something i could do, even if it
A>>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:48:44AM +0300, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
A> >> Connecting ng_iface:inet and ng_ether:upper/lower do nothing, well, it
A> >> do something but not what you are waiting for, i think.
A>
A> DN> i know, hence was asking if there was something i could do, even if it
A> DN> meant
Hi, Dinesh,
Monday, January 19, 2004, 8:29:23 PM, you wrote:
DN> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
>> DN> connecting the ng_iface hook inet to ng_ether's upper or lower doesnt make
>> DN> any sense because ng_ether itself does not do an encasulation of the IP
>> DN> packet into an eth
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
> DN> connecting the ng_iface hook inet to ng_ether's upper or lower doesnt make
> DN> any sense because ng_ether itself does not do an encasulation of the IP
> DN> packet into an ethernet frame. or am i wrong here, and just configuring it
> DN> wrongly
Hi all,
Monday, January 19, 2004, 12:34:25 PM, you wrote:
DN> hey all,
skiped
DN> i need some understanding on what exactly ng_iface achieves, as it makes a
DN> reference to the hook inet being connected to something. however,
DN> connecting the ng_iface hook inet to ng_ether's upper or lower
hey all,
am beginning to learn on how to manipulate netgraph nodes. i've read
archie cobbs' paper at http://www.daemonnews.org/23/netgraph.html and
it provided a good backgrounder on using netgraph. i'm now playing around
with ng_socket, ng_tee, ng_one2many and ng_iface to accomplish round
ro
Thor Legvold writes:
> The "default" connection speed seems to be 64000 bps according to the log.
> The manual states you don't need to set anything regarding bandwidth or
> speed unless you're on an asynchronous dialup (modem, etc). I'm on a 11Mbs
> wireless WAN, and would like to know if and
A few things I've noticed:
The "default" connection speed seems to be 64000 bps according to the log.
The manual states you don't need to set anything regarding bandwidth or
speed unless you're on an asynchronous dialup (modem, etc). I'm on a 11Mbs
wireless WAN, and would like to know if and h
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 11:56:22PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> in -current there is the eiface node that makes a virtual
> ethernet interface.
>
> it is available elsewhere for 4.x but not yet checked in. it is not built by
> default in -current but IS checked in.
> Is that what you want?
No
Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> I'm looking at a project at work using netgraph which will need nodes for
> tunnels like those for ethernet devices. I'll definatly need to do tun
> devices and possiably gif devices as well. First, is this a reasonable
> thing to attempt? I'm pretty sure it is, but if
I'm looking at a project at work using netgraph which will need nodes for
tunnels like those for ethernet devices. I'll definatly need to do tun
devices and possiably gif devices as well. First, is this a reasonable
thing to attempt? I'm pretty sure it is, but if it's not I've got the
opportuni
15 matches
Mail list logo
