> > >Encryption is a good idea for any wireless network.
> > >I believe bluetooth has a little more in this respect over 802.11 but
> > >I do not know any sure statement whether by itself it is enough.
> > >Eg you may need to run IPSec or similar over any wireless link to secure
> > >your data.
>
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 09:36:46PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> >Encryption is a good idea for any wireless network.
> >I believe bluetooth has a little more in this respect over 802.11 but
> >I do not know any sure statement whether by itself it is enough.
> >Eg you may need to run IPSec or s
Tony Frank wrote:
Encryption is a good idea for any wireless network.
I believe bluetooth has a little more in this respect over 802.11 but
I do not know any sure statement whether by itself it is enough.
Eg you may need to run IPSec or similar over any wireless link to secure
your data.
I don'
Hi there,
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 08:56:08PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> * the office is not very big, just as big as the bluetooth signal can
> reach. There are confidential information in the office, I don't want
> anyone to get my data by just stopping a car in front of the office and
> list
Hello,
> Hello. I'll make a small wireless network in my office in the coming month.
> Now I'm considering bluetooth instead of 802.11. In the office I have a
> freebsd server, my own notebook runs freebsd. Other computers run MAC OS
> and Windows.
ok
> * the office is not very big, just as
Hello. I'll make a small wireless network in my office in the coming month.
Now I'm considering bluetooth instead of 802.11. In the office I have a
freebsd server, my own notebook runs freebsd. Other computers run MAC OS
and Windows.
* the office is not very big, just as big as the bluetooth si
