"Crist J. Clark" wrote:
> Why not?
>
> map if0 192.168.100.0/24 -> 192.0.2.10/32 portmap tcp/udp auto
> map if0 192.168.100.0/24 -> 192.0.2.10/32
> bimap if0 192.168.100.1/32 -> 192.0.2.10/32
> map if0 172.16.0.0/16 -> 192.0.2.12/32 portmap tcp/udp auto
> map if0 172.16.0.0/16 -> 192.0
"Crist J. Clark" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:44:26PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > > I forgot point out that ipnat(8) will do this as-is if that is an
> > > option for you.
> >
> > Hmm, I've read man ipnat and still not sure how can I achieve
> > a combination of redirection ip<->ip
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:44:26PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > I forgot point out that ipnat(8) will do this as-is if that is an
> > option for you.
>
> Hmm, I've read man ipnat and still not sure how can I achieve
> a combination of redirection ip<->ip and map net<->ip.
Why not?
map i
> I forgot point out that ipnat(8) will do this as-is if that is an
> option for you.
Hmm, I've read man ipnat and still not sure how can I achieve
a combination of redirection ip<->ip and map net<->ip.
Eugene
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 04:26:19PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> "Crist J. Clark" wrote:
>
> > > Would it be hard to implement this?
> >
> > Probably not too bad. Apparently no stampede for this functionality
> > though. There usually is not a lot to gain by mapping different
> > internal netw
"Crist J. Clark" wrote:
> > Would it be hard to implement this?
>
> Probably not too bad. Apparently no stampede for this functionality
> though. There usually is not a lot to gain by mapping different
> internal networks to different external addresses except maybe some
> warm fuzzies.
Conside
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 02:31:12PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> "Crist J. Clark" wrote:
>
> > > Suppose we have many tens of separated private networks each having its own
> > > public address and own gateway. Is is possible to configure natd to do
> > > static nat for network masks, not only
"Crist J. Clark" wrote:
> > Suppose we have many tens of separated private networks each having its own
> > public address and own gateway. Is is possible to configure natd to do
> > static nat for network masks, not only for sets of hosts? I'd like to
> > say:
> >
> > redirect_address 172.20.2.0
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 12:30:02PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> man natd says it's possible to implement static nat with one public address
> for the set of private hosts. It's very useful.
>
> Suppose we have many tens of separated private networks each having its own
> public addre
Hi!
man natd says it's possible to implement static nat with one public address
for the set of private hosts. It's very useful.
Suppose we have many tens of separated private networks each having its own
public address and own gateway. Is is possible to configure natd to do
static nat for netwo
10 matches
Mail list logo
